@Varven@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 1 year agoPls someone make this realitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square254fedilinkarrow-up11.75Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.72Karrow-down1imagePls someone make this realitylemmy.world@Varven@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 1 year agomessage-square254fedilink
minus-square@user134450@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-21 year ago Because it’s a prejudicial term, not because the past isn’t fucking shitty. If that were true then what do you call the classical age? The darker ages?
minus-square@PugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoWe generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
minus-square@Trainguyrom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish10•edit-21 year agoOoh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @oktux@lemm.ee!
minus-square@Hadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoCan you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
minus-square@oktux@lemm.eelinkfedilink7•1 year agoIt sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
If that were true then what do you call the classical age? The darker ages?
We generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
Ooh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it
Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @oktux@lemm.ee!
Can you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
It sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
Thanks, TIL I learned