@Samsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 11 months agoIt's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square1038fedilinkarrow-up12.45Karrow-down1752
arrow-up11.69Karrow-down1imageIt's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry.lemmy.ml@Samsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 11 months agomessage-square1038fedilink
minus-square@justastranger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink16•11 months agoHave you seen how much more desperate Wikipedia gets every time they need to beg for donations?
minus-square@WIPocket@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•edit-211 months agoThey dont degrade the service until you pay. They dont lock features behind a paywall, they dont have ads. They beg you to pay, they dont extort you. Why does it matter that they seem desperate?
minus-square@wahminglink5•11 months agoWould YOU want to feel that desperation if you were the creator wondering if you could make rent next month?
minus-square@Perfide@reddthat.comlinkfedilink2•11 months agoIn Wikipedias case at least, the desperation is 100% marketing bluster and has been for at least a decade. Wikipedia is VERY well funded.
minus-square@Perfide@reddthat.comlinkfedilink3•11 months agoThat’s marketing BS. Wikipedia is very well funded and in fact they consistently blow way past their fundraising goals
Have you seen how much more desperate Wikipedia gets every time they need to beg for donations?
They dont degrade the service until you pay. They dont lock features behind a paywall, they dont have ads. They beg you to pay, they dont extort you. Why does it matter that they seem desperate?
Would YOU want to feel that desperation if you were the creator wondering if you could make rent next month?
In Wikipedias case at least, the desperation is 100% marketing bluster and has been for at least a decade. Wikipedia is VERY well funded.
That’s marketing BS. Wikipedia is very well funded and in fact they consistently blow way past their fundraising goals