@JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 year agoGooglingprogramming.devimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageGooglingprogramming.dev@JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 year agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-square@Evotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink22•1 year agoShould start asking them like, why did you do this? Why did you chose this method? To make them sweat :p
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoThat used to make sense when LLMs were not the thing, when evaluating assessments from students, half of which asked someone else and didn’t bother to even read the code
minus-square@howrar@lemmy.calinkfedilink13•1 year agoIf no one can make sense of the change, then you reject it. Makes no difference if it was generated with an LLM or copy-pasted from Stackoverflow.
minus-square@31337@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink5•1 year agoI just ask ChatGPT to review pull requests.
Should start asking them like, why did you do this? Why did you chose this method? To make them sweat :p
That used to make sense when LLMs were not the thing, when evaluating assessments from students, half of which asked someone else and didn’t bother to even read the code
If no one can make sense of the change, then you reject it. Makes no difference if it was generated with an LLM or copy-pasted from Stackoverflow.
I just ask ChatGPT to review pull requests.