• @Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2115 months ago

    It would be an awful lot easier than trying to salvage Biden’s image as it stands. If they do it right this should be super easy, but if they drag their heels on the changes necessary then it might be a lot harder.

    This is BIG opportunity to rebrand and show what really matters to the party.

    • Cruxifux
      link
      fedilink
      825 months ago

      This is the perfect opportunity to do that! But I have absolutely zero faith in them actually doing that.

      But maybe I’ve become jaded in my age with politics. Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

        • Cruxifux
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Lol seriously.

          Also “Her Turn” as a campaign slogan was so bad.

      • @djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        I think the fact that the party was willing to do this says a lot. They’ve already avoided the worst possible option, I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

        • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          315 months ago

          Are they going to force Biden to run against his will or what is the plan here? If Biden dies, are Democrats not allowed to run at all because they aren’t allowed to replace him.

        • @Nurgle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          215 months ago

          Dems haven’t even officially nominated anyone yet, dont think the republicans would get very far with that stunt

        • @dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          The thing is, it’s not the Democratic Party replacing Biden anymore. Biden has willfully stepped down, and given his support to Harris. To put it another way, Biden is no longer “being replaced”.

          But, that may not matter in the long run. The question now is when/if Republicans take this to court, and whether or not the judge decides to hear the case or not and how long that will take.

          As far as I know, judges have historically decided not to pursue a case if it would impede the election process (e.g., gerrymandered district ruled illegal, but still used because not enough time to redraw maps). I would like to hope that the Democratic Party gets the same curtsy in this case.

          However, I feel that right now given the current political climate, and the current way judges have been deciding in favor of the Republican agenda, this may not be the case and the new candidate will be tied up in legal tape to be able to campaign properly. The Republicans will cease upon this opportunity and use it against the Democratic Party to make them look weak and unable to do anything they say they will do. And to be honest, they won’t be wrong.

          Democrats are their own worst enemy, and their hubris will be to all of our detriment.

          https://youtu.be/-lm0Cy8gwvk

        • @Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          from the article

          Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      Yeah it was going to be impossible to properly move forward from this. There would be too much media coverage and division and lingering questions.

      Now though, we have a real opportunity to unify, and make several arguments to voters – Democrats listened and picked a younger candidate. We can also flip the script on candidate age now