• HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -31 year ago

    It could be for some things, especially for larger scale coordination. That a company like Zoom, which could easily dogfood its productivity tools to create better ones wants engineers back in the office at least part of the time may indicate that there are some issues with full remote.

    • @Wander@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      What managers and CEOs don’t get is that you better have a problem that requires loads of “team spirit” and “culture”, or otherwise the added stress from commuting, in-person interactions, not being at your own place, etc… is going to be a drag for regular work.

      So you either really really have a problem that requires people to be in office or you are better off letting people choose where to they work.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 year ago

        That assumes that regular work doesn’t require coordination or can’t be helped by knowing there other people they work with and remembering that their coworkers are human.

        I’ve had junior staff self-report that they don’t ask as many questions as they should when working even though instant messaging, video calls, and screen sharing tools are there. They also don’t always know there may be others they can ask as those relationships take longer to develop full remote.

        I’ve got one coworker who sounds nice in the office but will scream at those working under them on video calls for an extended period of time. They like working remote, but others aren’t exactly a fan of it.

        I’ve seen email chains go from coordination to accusation to fighting because there isn’t as much room to maneuver and be wrong in email or Slack compared to being in person.

        That isn’t “team spirit” exactly, but maybe an attempt to create a more collaborative “culture”. And coordination is part of the work, even if it doesn’t feel like “work”.

        • @Jerkface@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I think I see your point. I had a professor who was an absolute dick on Zoom. Condescending, intrusive, pushy. When we went back to in-person, I didn’t have any of those issues with him.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Yeah. I think Lemmy self selects people who can communicate well via computer. We aren’t the norm.

    • @schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder how a tiny company such as Microsoft is able to pull it off? We’ve been fully work-from-home-or-office pre-pandemic and no one seems to care as long as your team’s results are fine.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Hybrid or is full remote still acceptable?

        Also, it would be interesting to know if some teams lost the ability to do full remote because of performance and what were the decisions that would trigger that.

        • @schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, most teams work remote, unless they have specific requirements, e.g. hardware, network setups etc. However many engineering teams love to hang out together a few days per week so they meet in the office. Consultants/services/support are fully remote and these team are usually distributed so they almost never meet in person.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            And that makes sense that the development teams have some face time while the support staff which don’t need to interact with others work full remote.

            However, it does set a standard that those who show up to the office are more likely to move up in their careers.