Zuckerberg said senior Biden administration officials “repeatedly pressured” Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to “censor” content in 2021. “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken,” he wrote to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). “Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction – and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again,” Zuckerberg added.

  • shish_mish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2063 months ago

    Asking them to take down stuff that is clearly false and can endanger people is not censorship.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      583 months ago

      not to mention, basically, he’s handing the platform to a very vocal minority.

      A minority that probably hates his guts. because lets face it, everybody hates Zuck the Cuck

      • @RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        A minority that probably hates his guts.

        How is this relevant to us? The subject here is about the platform’s influence on society, not of Zuckerberg.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          The platform is accommodating people- or trying to, anyhow- that would likely turn on him in a heart beat.

          It’s patently stupid to alienate the vast majority of people, who look at antivax as rampant stupidity, to accommodate people who will inevitably prove to be too extreme.

          Look at what’s happening on twitter, with advertisers leaving.

          That’s about to be Facebook.

          • @RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            that would likely turn on him in a heart beat.

            Again, what happens to him personally or to Facebook as a company is irrelevant when it comes to how our lives are affected. The regulation of social platforms is good for society regardless of the efect regulation has on the owners or the companies owning the platforms.

            Your argument is built around the wrong desirable outcome.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              This isn’t argument for regulation social spaces.

              This is me passing around the popcorn and watching Facebook go up in flames.

              Zuck is being dementedly stupid here. That’s all I’m saying.

          • @grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Okay, look: I really need you to knock it off with this argument, please. 'Cause if you keep going with it, you’re gonna start convincing me that maybe we should let Zuckerberg post all the anti-vaxxer bullshit his shriveled, blackened heart desires, after all!

            (And that’s bad because, as much as I’d love to see Zuck fuck up, @RidcullyTheBrown is right.)

      • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Unless they can infiltrate his underground bunker in Hawaii, I doubt he cares how much they hate him.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      You can also not claim freedom of speech when yelling fire in a crowded Theatre. I don’t understand why this is different. In this case the platform is amplifying people yelling fire and even creates spaces for people yelling fire to gather and talk strategy.

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Wat? It’s literally the definition of censorship. I think you mean to say censorship is not, in and of itself, bad.