• @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13 months ago

    They are, in fact, NOT “as clean as each other”. That is stupid and what I said still directly refutes that stupid thought.

    • Bob
      link
      fedilink
      -13 months ago

      For handling food, they certainly are as clean as each other! Unless you think gloves magically repel dust and so on while sitting in the open box on the kitchen shelf?

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Again, you are only demonstrating how withered and underdeveloped your idea of germ theory is…

        Do you think germs live well on a mostly sterile surface that contains no food or biological material? Or literally ON biological material?

        You’re not even making arguments about how the food itself can be contaminated, or that behavioral patterns can make the glove harder to notice when it gets dirty. No… they’re just equivalent… fucking pathetic thought process, there bud.

        • Bob
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Or literally ON biological material?

          That you’ve just washed? Nope! On a glove that’s been worn so long it’s got shite all over it? Yep!

          • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Cherry picking to sound smart. Besides, your hand is literally biology that can not only absorb chemicals, put puts off chemicals of its own. You’re just plain wrong, and your obstinance is pathetic.

            • Bob
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Cherry picking to sound smart.

              It was my point to begin with so I’m bringing it back within context!