• Raltoid
    link
    fedilink
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to trust multiple peer-reviewed medical studies over a youtube talk with under 600 views.

    Specially when it’s on a channel branding itself as being skeptical towards science.


    EDIT: On a closer look it’s straight up just one of those conspiracy theory channels and organizations that present itself as actual science.

    And here’s a study if someone wants to look at actual science regarding the placebo effect:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013051/

    • @irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      on a channel branding itself as being skeptical towards science.

      You may have misread - its description says it is a “science and skepticism event”. Not skeptical of science.

      I’m with you, otherwise.

    • @charlytune@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      QED is actually the opposite of a conspiracy theory channel or organisation. They’re very pro science and critical thinking, and spend a lot of time debunking conspiracy theories and pseudo-science.

      I’ve got no skin in the debate in this thread, I didn’t watch the actual video and have no opinion on the validity of what you or the other posters are saying, I’m just pointing out that I think that you’re wrong to dismiss the channel as a source, even if you disagree with the claims made in that specific video.

    • @Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      -181 year ago

      I hope you do, because no good peer-reviewed studies ever produced the results you are talking about. I urge you to show me which ones you are talking about.
      And you should learn to look closer. Maybe get more that a couple of words out of headline, you know, how scientificly minded people are suppose to be.