@FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 days agoTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.worldimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1375arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1357arrow-down1imageTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.world@FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 days agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@borf@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-26 days agoBarely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
minus-square@Hawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•6 days agoThe pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.
Barely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side
If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
The pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.