• lemonflavoured
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    This is a daft idea, it would basically stop any politican from saying anything or making any policy announcements. The people promoting this will be annoyed when MPs treat this deabate as a joke, but it’s a completely unrealistic proposal.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Yes it’s completely unrealistic to tell the truth.

    • @wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      The key word is “knowingly”. Making a statement that is your best understanding of the situation but doesn’t turn out to be true in the fullness of time is very different to lying.

      • lemonflavoured
        link
        fedilink
        -61 year ago

        But even in that situation they would be accused of lying, so it would have to be investigated. It would massively chill speech.

        • @wahming
          link
          111 year ago

          Given the alternative of having them make outright lies, i.e. regarding the benefits of Brexit? I’m OK with that

    • @abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      would basically stop any politician from saying anything

      So you’re saying that it is impossible for a politician to speak without lying ?

      I don’t care who you normally vote for, would you mind sitting the next election out ? Preferably all the ones after that too.

      • lemonflavoured
        link
        fedilink
        -41 year ago

        No, but I’m saying that if you make it illegal “lie” then they will say very little in case they are accused of lying.

        • @abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I’m saying that if you make it illegal “lie” then they will say very little in case they are accused of lying.

          Why the scare quotes around lie ? The word has a straight forward meaning which is already defined in House of Commons rules.i.e knowingly mislead.

          It’s not even “negligently mislead” where they say something they should have known was not true, but the much tougher test of proving they knew it wasn’t true.

          A ridiculously low bar, and yet you think even that is too high. Is this because you support politicians who have been shown regularly to knowingly mislead ?

          The majority of parliament arrive carefully well prepared with facts. It’s only a small number who deliberately lie, our former PM has been proved to be one of those.