A top economist has joined the growing list of China’s elite to have disappeared from public life after criticizing Xi Jinping, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

Zhu Hengpeng served as deputy director of the Institute of Economics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) for around a decade.

CASS is a state research think tank that reports directly to China’s cabinet. Chen Daoyin, a former associate professor at Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, described it as a “body to formulate party ideology to support the leadership.”

According to the Journal, the 55-year-old disappeared shortly after remarking on China’s sluggish economy and criticizing Xi’s leadership in a private group on WeChat.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4112 hours ago

      Even then, it isn’t healthy, just healthier. The USA is still going to going to experience economic issues of a growing elderly population, it just won’t be as bad.

      • @Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        This is the new normal for highly developed economies. The best they can hope for is a 1 to 1 replacement of their population. We’re not likely to see another baby boom occur.

        We’re not going to see a typical population pyramid any more. Because that means a large infant death rate and either war, disasters or a massive suicide epidemic cutting away the young adult population to get the pyramid shape.

        • @zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 hours ago

          Given that the amount of habitable land will decrease causing mass migrations, you don’t need a 1 to 1 ratio to maintain a population size.

      • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3412 hours ago

        The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration that they can adjust at will. On the other hand, China’s leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

        • @rammer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          152 minutes ago

          The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

          Except that even in the Americas the population is declining. There is a limit to it. The US can outlast many other countries because of immigration but it too has to face the same problem as everyone else.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

          glances at US immigration policy

          Does it?

          China’s leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

          Wit drier than a lint trap.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 hours ago

          Immigration definitely helps, especially compared to China. I’m just noting that there will still be some decrease in the ratio of retired workers to current workers.

        • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 hours ago

          Have you… have you seen how Americans have been talking about the border? Especially this election cycle? I don’t know if would characterize either party’s constituencies as “receptive”.

            • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -610 hours ago

              Was there supposed to be some argument or statement attached to this source, or…?

              • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                810 hours ago

                The US has the highest volume of immigrants in the world, 50x more than China. With or without a reduction of new immigrants that number will remain high.

                • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  Sure, the US has an advantage in raw number of immigrants versus China. No one is arguing that.

                  My point is that touting “our melting-pot-loving leaders” versus “their Han-supremacist demagogues” at the height of your unprecedented devolution into fascism isn’t quite the own you think it is.

                  • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    6
                    edit-2
                    8 hours ago

                    Never claimed to “own” you, but I’d argue this anti-immigrant rhetoric is exceedingly precedented for the US (see Chinese exclusion act, Japanese internment, Alien Act, etc). Even with those shameful events as a part of the US’ history, the nation has been a consistent and significant net importer of immigrants. That makes me confident that the US won’t face a demographic crisis in the same way China may (barring a change in Chinese policy)

          • @Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1310 hours ago

            You realize there’s more to immigration than the border between Mexico and the US, right?

            I know they ignore it, but you don’t have to follow along with them.

            • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              610 hours ago

              50 million immigrants in the US, and that data is 5 years old. Germany comes in second with 13 million. It’s not even close. I don’t see how a demographic crisis could happen, even if they hypothetically cut immigration in half

      • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1812 hours ago

        Basically, yes. The sides are nearly parallel, which is great. Compare with China’s, which forms a steep V. Once GenX hits retirement age they are completely screwed. The CCP’s recent push for “traditional family values” and increased birth rates is no coincidence.