Track_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1910arrow-down113cross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1897arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
minus-square@TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•edit-21 year agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-square@BluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.