Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

  • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Firefox now offers the option to collect a minimal amount of data for them and inform the network indirectly.

    This is a good thing for the end user.

    I’m not sure that collecting data is actually a good thing for the end user, but to each their own I suppose.

    • Konala Koala
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, the reason they could be collecting data, is to feed it to an AI.

    • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      It’s an improvement over the current systems. Incremental improvements to the state of things can be a good thing too.