- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
The Movement for Settlement in Southern Lebanon said the settlement of the area will bring ‘true and stable security to northern Israel’
That’s what happens when you resort to violence. The strong win and the weak cry about injustice. Maybe next time they’ll not bombard Israel with rockets if the price tag is too high.
Spoken like a true fascist.
There there. I was only kidding. Everybody knows violence results in the weak winning and the strong crying about it. 🙄
Israeli attacks on Lebanon have killed more than 1,974 people, including 127 children. At least 9,384 people wounded.
There is also the fact that Israel has been committing genocide for over a year.
Clearly, more violence is what will fix this. /s
Be sure to let me know when an #-page report is released and/or casualty projections are large enough that the price-tag isn’t worth it. Otherwise you’re using violence to justify violence and this cycle of death continues… to whose benefit again?
If you read the first three chapters of that report, you’ll have your answer
Israel has repeatedly chosen violence over peace. They’ve even assassinated the Principal Peace Negotiator multiple times, in order to continue delaying peace negotiations
The question was rhetorical. But no, I’m not reading your clearly biased copypasta.
Now you’re calling a Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor Report a ‘biased copypasta’ and completely disregarding the entire report.
Yes, I am. Didn’t get a paragraph in when these criticisms became obvious to me before I even checked. OFC I disregard the report. It is biased af.
Ooof, I’ve never seen someone use MBFC as a source before. That’s just sad.
Not as sad as what 42k dead? Keep on defending violence with violence though. Definitely not sad.
MBFC is a terrible way to consider whether a source is credible or not. But even if you look at the MBFC for Euro-Med, is shows no failed fact checks and a bias for human rights… If you consider that kind of bias worth disregarding, what does that say? You’ve given no genuine reason to ignore the Report.
Just a question do you get tired of being a genocide apologist or does it just come naturally to you?
Wow! You’ve just changed me entire outlook on the Holocaust!
Israel would be living safely if they didn’t decide to colonize Gaza, the West bank and many other Arab land in 67
I guess you could consider Israel strong if you remember that this strength comes from the US taxpayers being swindled out of their healthcare, social support and education money, which is funneled into donations to Israel and a massive armed forces that keeps its genocide regime propped up, while US tuition prices skyrocket and schools barely have teachers and facilities in many places, certainly not to the same level as it used to be.
Meanwhile hordes of people live in tents, work 60 hours a week living paycheck to paycheck and have no medical, paternity leave or sometimes even the same number of paid time off days as the rest of the world. Even the president takes a huge crap all over protesting rail workers, who wanted some sick leave and some safety in their workplace, which sees American railways eroding in quality and safety in favor of bigger trains and less personnel operating them.
I guess genocide has a price that someone has to pay. Honestly, i wouldn’t see that necessarily as strength. More like outright exploitation of the American people, the Palestinians and now the Lebanese for an old fairly tale that some magic being told a long time ago.
Thats … awkward. By your understanding the WW2 holocaust was …fine and normal.
Thats how deep your morality goes huh. Wow. So you’re a Nazi then?
Nope, just somebody that can understand complete sentences.
OOC what’s the casualty count at? You think name calling is going to bring them back, or is it just to make you feel better for not doing anything substantial to save lives?