@lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 month agoI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.org@lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square144fedilink
minus-square@Nurse_Robot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•edit-21 month agoEh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
minus-squareGingaNingalinkfedilink6•1 month agoThats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.
Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language
Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.