• @penguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade. But each passing year sees new phones being more and more iterative. There’s hardly any difference at all anymore between individual years.

    I’m at the point now where I keep my phones until they break or stop getting security updates.

    • 6xpipe_
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade

      And they were subsidized by the cell phone company, so they only cost $200 (In many places in the US, at least).

      • @Achird@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah definitely this is a big factor.

        I have a small pot I save into for my phone upgrade each month. Waiting longer means I get a shiner new phone when I do finally decide to upgrade.

        And once I have it I want it to last as long as possible!

        When it used to be just part of your contract you wouldn’t think about, just get a new one when your contract said it was time.

        • 6xpipe_
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          There wasn’t even a maximum on the contract. When I got my first two phones, I agreed to a 2-year cellular contract. If I closed my account or moved providers before that, I had to pay AT&T some amount of money to kill the contract. After those two years were up, I could do whatever I wanted. I was then on a month-to-month payment, like standard cell plans today. They just wanted to make sure to recoup their money over 2 years for subsidizing my cheaper phone upfront.

          Now, the subsidization is more like a subscription fee, where there are additional fees on the bill each month toward the phone and the cell phone company encourages you to get a new one once it’s paid off. You’re still paying full price for a phone. Possibly forever.