The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

  • merde alorsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -34 hours ago

    do you really expect people in rural areas to ditch cars?

    will they go back to carts and horses?

    • 佐藤カズマ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 hours ago

      Honestly? Buses would be a good short-term solution that can be implemented immediately with the right political will, and enough force.

    • @AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 hours ago

      The US used to have a comprehensive rail network. Every single town had a train station. We already had the solution to this problem.

      • @Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        I live in a rail hub in the us. The city is nicknamed after it and train tracks literally run through the city center.

        It would take me 6 hours to walk there.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 hour ago

          Please tell me you’re exaggerating. I live in a small city and it only takes me maybe an hour to walk across town. If it’s taking you 6 hours, it’s not rural.

      • merde alorsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 hours ago

        and what do you use to get to the train station?

        how do you carry goods to that station? Does your train have a stop in every farm?

        • @AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 hours ago

          Wow you’re right there is a use case for a vehicle therefore it’s literally impossible to have public transit in rural areas, despite the fact that it already existed /s

          • merde alorsOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            it’s not like i don’t hate cars, i do. But i really can’t see how you’re going to convince “rurals” with that argument

            good luck to you

            • @AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 hours ago

              We aren’t discussing tactics for convincing people of anything. We’re discussing facts. And the fact is there’s no reason public transit can’t work in rural areas as you stated.

              • merde alorsOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                243 minutes ago

                i’m not from the U.S.

                there’s a well established network of rails here and we can say that rail transport is the backbone of this country.

                yet people in rural areas still think that cars are essential just to survive ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_vests_protests

                i may think otherwise, i can live without a car, but it’s condescending to tell them “there’s no reason public transit can’t work in rural areas”

                even those who commute by bike+train have cars because “public transit” isn’t a solution to all their needs.