• MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Steam is undoubtedly convenient.

    But if any game you care about keeping is on GOG, it’s a good idea to buy a copy on there, and then squirreling away the offline installer files/extracted game files somewhere safe.

    • @index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      Steam is undoubtedly inconvenient. Imagine a third party proprietary launcher filled with ads was required to use your browser.

      • @RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 days ago

        You can use steam without ever seeing an ad. Due to low internet bandwidth I just turned off the couple of popups and I currently see 0 ads if I don’t specifically go to the store part. Steam boots into library, so no ads, none in downloads. I don’t use the rest unless I’m actually looking for a new game.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        The only “ad” steam pushes into your face is the startup pop-up, which can be disabled in settings.

        Without that, you can use whatever you like to launch your games. Valve doesn’t care. You can have a desktop shortcut for every one of your games and never see steam open, or use something like PlayNite to aggregate the games from several services into one library.

      • @ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        It was definitely seen as convenient compared to installing a game off of 6 discs and then hunting down patches from ad-supported sites like FileFront, one version increment at a time.