• @Kookie215@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13819 days ago

    They want us to riot so bad. They are foaming at the mouth trying to justify enacting Martial Law and every day it feels like its more and more inevitable that we will end up there. Either they are going to keep violating the constitution and getting away with it until they don’t need to enact it, or eventually shit hits the fan at a protest. I don’t see any other option at this point. They are taunting us, and it’s going to work eventually.

    • @toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      NAIL ON THE HEAD.

      the ironic thing is that the us govt has done a ton of studies on the ‘breaking point of society’. but they’re not science bros, so they’re just gonna do it their way.

      even the canada thing. he’s literally costing himself a canadian conservative govt that was all-but guaranteed. but he doesn’t want that with canada; he just wants (edit-typo) manufactured conflict.

      but you’re absolutely right. he’s doing everything he can to cause riots so that he can enact “marshall” law and crack down once and for all. my god, why can’t my american neigbours all see it?

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 days ago

        not science bros, so they’re just gonna do it their way.

        i just think they’re petulant children with absolutely no self control

        trump literally as old as he is right now would take the marshmallow in the stanford marshmallow experiment, and then try and convince someone that you stole his other marshmallow

      • @DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 days ago

        Update. That election ultimately did end up in a conservative loss. In no small part to the trump attitudes on geopolitics and the nonexistent “culture war”

        • @toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 days ago

          i just wrote a whole fucking paragraph, hit send, and it disappeared. i need to remember to write my shit in a text editor when i’m on lemmy.

          i defy anyone to show me any other reason that this historic swing solely due to the actions of one particular idiot.

          i went on in my first draft to describe how politics in canada still have some nuance, and that this was an indication that TONS of people who were ready to kick red to the curb had to hold their noses to vote for our sovereignty.

          but - to me - this shouldn’t be the way things should be going. i agree with a lot of people in that the liberal party really needed a reckoning. if harris won in the us, i’d have been fine with a conservative pm. but pp definitely didn’t do himself any favours, either, and it would have been a lot of OTHER people holding their noses to vote pc. hell, i’ve been impressed with doug ford lately, and i didn’t think i’d ever say that.

          so now that i’ve typed this up in xed, we’ll see how many tries it takes to get it to stick. my guess, given my luck, is that it’ll work on the fucking first try now.

    • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1419 days ago

      I appreciate that this “riots are part of their plan” post acknowledges that not rioting just means a bloodless coup. People keep putting this argument up like the optimal move is just continually not taking the bait under the assumption that some easy solution will eventually come to fruition, but it’s just the frog arguing for boiling itself. They’re not going to just have four years of people letting them do whatever they want and then run free and fair elections because we didn’t take the bait.

      • Would be nice if there was some leadership on the dems side to, you know, address the volatility of the nation right now. Schumer seriously sending angry letters. If riots break out I hold them equally responsible. They will literally sit on their hands until the country goes up in flames and come out afterwards saying we need unity.

    • @peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      719 days ago

      I don’t think they want it. Numbers aren’t in their favor. We aren’t remotely close to Russian or Chinese levels of generational suppression.

      But they likely don’t know they don’t want it. They assume they will get absolute power one way or the other because China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc have absolute power in their state.

      I doubt the Tiananmen Square massacre would have been nearly as effective with the speed at which information flows nowadays. Sure - major corporate media can suppress as much as it can, but millions of people were able to turn out for protests quickly, and think of how fast we all found out about the arrest of two judges.

      Against any totalitarian government, the most effective weapon is information, followed closely by communication. I am willing to bet that there isn’t code sitting on our phones waiting for the government to just shut it all down.

      • @hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 days ago

        The government can absolutely shut down the internet and telecommunications. They can also send propaganda straight to your phone that you can’t stop.

        • @RedPostItNote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          119 days ago

          One time I was at the internet place picking up a new router. The internet in the area had just gone down and angry people were literally coalescing upon the store like zombies.

          Godspeed to anyone who turns the data off to America

      • @SpaceShort@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        018 days ago

        This means we should encourage more and more people to join Lemmy, Bluesky etc., install Linux and donate to Wikipedia.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      419 days ago

      It’s a great strategy, either we riot and they bring out the army, or we do nothing and they get what they want unopposed.
      “The second American revolution will be bloodless if the left allows it”

      We’re so fucked.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      219 days ago

      I’ve been expecting the US to explode into a near civil war type situation for months now. You have a relatively small group of very heavily armed people who are willing to die for their dictator, you have a now dictatorial regime wanting to change the US into a theocracy and you have the other 200+ million Americans with varying degrees of weapons who are just about ready to make shit hit the fan. I wonder if US military has prepared for this, and whose side it will chose, but I imagine it will be fracture d and splintered between factions.

      It would be super interesting to watch if it wasnt so goddamn scary because these fuckers have the world’s second largest nuclear arsenal and have of these idiots in command are the doomsday types who will happily fire nukes world wide when shit gets real, just to make sure that jeebus would come back to earth to pick them up personally.

      Fuck I hate this and I hate these hateful people. I hate it that these people have pushed so much hate in me

    • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 days ago

      You are 100% correct, that is definitely the plan. Have the RedHats instigate violence, then call in the military to quell the violence with even more ferocious violence, and Hegseth will definitely give the order to fire on American citizens. It will be like Tiananmen Square, but in cities all over America. Once he has declared Martial Law, he can suspend elections until peace is restored, and since he will control the peace.

      The 2026 midterms are shaping up to be a bloodbath, and he can’t afford to lost one or both chambers to the Democrats, where they can have control of investigative committees, with subpoena and arrest powers.

      So he has to time it right, so the courts and SCOTUS wont have time to react before election day. That means next summer/fall. By then, Luigi’s trial will be in play, many more activities will be criminalized, he will have sent Americans to El Salvador, the first stage of the 30,000 bed facility in Gitmo may be open (or soon), he will have imprisoned political opponents, store shelves will be empty, other goods will be tripled in price, we’ll be in a deep recession, there will be food shortages, etc. Anything is possible, but it will all add up to public outrage like we have never seen, and he will take full advantage of it to end our system of government, and become a one more incompetent Dictator.

      Then it’s on.

      • I’m pretty sure Trump will start a war before the elections, both to boost his ratings and to justify extraordinary powers because of the emergency that he will have just created.

        • @ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          218 days ago

          He tried very hard to do so with Iran last time around, when he committed a war crime faking a diplomatic meeting in order to assassinate one of their to generals.

          • Yes I think that it will be with Iran this time too. I mean, nobody can know with Trump since he’s an avatar of Chaos, but it is a good option. Big and powerful enough that you don’t accidentally win in 48 hours. Not an ally of any western country. Already have propaganda queued up since 1979 or so.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      fedilink
      019 days ago

      The threat of Martial Law is a conspiracy theory at best. There aren’t nearly enough troops AND police to institute it. Stop trying to pretend it’s even possible

        • BigFig
          link
          fedilink
          English
          919 days ago

          Big “i’ll watch and laugh from my house” energy. Probably doesn’t even live here.

            • Geetnerd
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -319 days ago

              You’re a teenage kid in your parent’s house, pretending to be tough. It’s obvious.

          • @toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            edit - i’ve been informed that i’ve replied to the wrong comment.

            cringe. you should probably at least look into someone’s recent comments before you make your comments. i’m canadian, and there’s no doot aboot it. but what the heck does that have to do with the point i made? for what it’s worth, i grew up in tennessee, so maybe i’m just another dirty immigrant?

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    3119 days ago

    Oohhhhh

    All those Scotus justices making sure trump would be able to become king… Then they get nervous because king start behaving like a king and now king wants to kill them. Would could have seen this coming except everyone who has ever opened a history book?

    These supreme Court justices are about as supreme as my ass.

    • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      419 days ago

      These supreme Court justices are about as supreme as my ass.

      They aren’t even as supreme as a chalupa from fucking taco bell.

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2719 days ago

    If they arrest a SCOTUS Judge they can be DANG SURE that they’ll get at Least ONE STERN LETTER the Following Week or Two!

  • @tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    1118 days ago

    The SCOTUS justices who voted to make the president a king should’ve been dropped in a black site immediately upon that decision coming out, but Biden didn’t have the fortitude or vision to protect the country from fascism.

  • lemmy_acct_id_8647
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1119 days ago

    I have never seen a face in as much need of meeting a high velocity crowbar as this cunt.

    • @Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      318 days ago

      The federal judges could also send people to arrest Trump.

      No, they cannot, because federal authorities won’t prosecute a sitting US President. Only the House, by way of Impeachment, and the Senate, by way of conviction can anything be done about Trump now.

      Additionally, SCOTUS gave the President total immunity when it comes to “official actions” which is not at all defined in any capacity, so the interpretation is up in the air. All’s Trump has to do is argue that these are official actions and nothing can feasibly be done.

      So he demands a sitting supreme court justice be arrested and they are. It goes to court and its found Trump can’t do that. The judge is released, and nothing happens to Trump at all. So he tries again. And again. And again. Until he’s finally successful.

      Roe v. Wade was considered the law of the land and no one ever thought it could ever be overturned. Republicans tried for over 50 years to get it reversed which everyone agreed was a fools errand. And then they did… Just because something can’t happen doesn’t mean it really can’t happen.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        218 days ago

        3 things:

        First off, you literally started an argument explaining that something can’t happen, then ended it by saying that something that can’t happen can happen, and that hurts my brain a bit.

        Secondly, one reason reason a judge can deputize people is for cases where the executive branch or law enforcement has gone rogue and they need to enforce the law outside of the regular channels.

        Third, the whole “Can’t arrest or charge a sitting President for any crime” thing isn’t a law, but a justice department policy. Deputized law enforcement and prosecutors from outside of the justice department wouldn’t be bound by that policy.

      • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 days ago

        That is a DoJ POLICY, not a law, nor is it in the Constitution. It has never really been tested, everybody has just gone along with it all these years. SCOTUS gave the president immunity, but with a loophole: it has to be part of his presidential duties. It could be argued that arresting opponents for doing their Constitutionally-mandated jobs is NOT within the President’s duties, and therefore he would not be immune. Same with doing things like ordering the military to fire on American protesters exercising their 1st Amendment rights. It will be up to SCOTUS to decide, and they’ve already shown that they wont rubber-stamp his nonsense.

        If he starts arresting SCOTUS justices, they arent likely to find in his favor for ANYTHING.

        • @dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Policies inform how the law and system works. The DOJ can change that policy, but since it is essentially under the control of the sitting president, that won’t happen.

          I think you misunderstand the power dynamic, the president controls the military and if he starts to arrest SCOTUS justices, I don’t think the SCOTUS rulings will matter any more, they won’t have any way to enforce their rulings that will stand up to the de facto power the president has.

          The SCOTUS rulings are already being ignored by this administration on other decisions that were made by them, so you could say we’re already past that.

          • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            318 days ago

            Supreme Courts around the world have found all sorts of ways of exercising power. They can deputize citizen volunteers to serve as temporary court enforcers. They can outright order the military to stand down and arrest the president. Hell, they could dig into the ancient tradition and declare the president an outlaw - literally outside the protection of the law, making it legal for anyone to straight-up kill the guy.

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    518 days ago

    Listening to this blonde reincarnation of Ri Chun-hee is … interesting. So close, she should wear pink. They did show a short statement by her on the BBC, and I counted more lies than sentences. Amazing.

  • @halferect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    419 days ago

    I don’t understand how the scotus didn’t see this coming. What do dictators hate? Anyone who has any possible power over them, so what do dictators do? Arrest or kill any possibility of opposition and number one was always gonna be scotus. They killed themselves

    • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      See, the thing is that conservatives always believe that they’re deeper into the in group than they really are. They can’t imagine themselves as part of the out group. Quick example, about five years back, I had a fox news addicted co-worker bitching at me about millennials. I was like “bro, we’re in our thirties, we’re not kids anymore”, because he and I are both the same age, and both millennials. He looked like I just slapped him and said “no, I am NOT a millennial”, so, because I physically cannot stop myself from arguing with anyone about anything, I spent five minutes proving to him that he was, in fact, a millennial. He put up the WOKE FAKE NEWStm defenses, cleared recent history, and was back to griping about millennials before the day was out, still supporting things that hurt millennials and not daring the imagine that Fox News could possibly be talking about him. He’s the child of immigrants, he’s got his citizenship by his dad being born here and him being born here. He supports rounding up brown people and ending birthright citizenship because he’ll still believe right down to his core that they’re not talking about him even as they’re loading him into the box cars.

      I would say it’s a crisis of empathy, but I’m not sure that’s completely true. I’m not going to fight people on Lemmy about it, but I personally know my own share of conservative people who have no problem with empathy (and many who do have a problem with it, in fairness). I think it’s a distinct phenomenon that they really do believe that it could never happen to them, or to anyone who doesn’t “deserve it”. I’ve encountered that kind of circular logic quite a bit, where if their policies hurt you, it’s probably because you deserved it, and their policies can’t possibly hurt them because they know they don’t deserve it.

      • @bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        218 days ago

        They believe the law is always on the side of good, despite much evidence to the contrary, and the mere fact that the law can be changed making it intrinsically not a moral absolute.

  • Bonus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    419 days ago

    If zombies were real, Helen Thomas would be pissed these two don’t have any brains to eat.

  • @mcv@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218 days ago

    Arrest them for corruption, perhaps? (He said hopefully)

    Of course not. Only for disagreeing with him or not supporting his illegal crackdown on Americans he doesn’t like.

  • @El_Azulito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    119 days ago

    So if Pam Bonnie is a sick of Aunt bootlegger then where are the levers of checks and balance. If she can arrest justices for nit bootlicking, then that’s game over.