• @Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 months ago

      To be fair, that’s on the saner side on the scale of antivaxers. As in if you don’t want to put “very dangerous unknown substances” into your body but still be safe you need as many vaccinated people as possible.

    • @blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      Except it’s their kids who are impacted are the ones we feel bad for, not them. (and I know their own kids could be considered as part of a Darwin award through a strict interpretation, but I’d rather not.)

      • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        If they have kids that survive, they are ineligible for a Darwin. The award is about ending their line in a stupid way, not just dying.

        • @pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          which is why if they take their kids with them, they technically should be eligible again.

  • @BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I had my first shingles vaccine a little bit ago, will get my second shot next month. I am pretty tough and get vaccinated whenever I can or should, and never feel much other than a bit tired, but the shingles vaccine kicked my ass for about a week. But I’ll still get the second shot next month because nothing is more painful than shingles, I’m told, and you can get them in your EYES.

    Found out I also qualify for the RSV vaccine so I’ll go get that this weekend as well as my 10th COVID shot, and a little later in the summer the pneumococcal vaccine, and I got a measles titer yesterday to see if I need that updated too. Y’all delulu antivaxxers aren’t going to kill me.

  • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This screencap is old, right? The UI looks different, and there are no checkmarks or engagement metrics.

    Hence the context is very different, as this is back when being antivaxx was unfashionable (and not a political signal like it is today).

    • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Lmao no idea what that’s even from and you’re over here analyzing it like true detective while missing the obvious date stamp on it.

    • Błażejko
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -92 months ago

      So if the date was 2015 … no one was waxed for covid :P Problem solved :D She was just dumb. That’s it !

      • @huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        There were anti-vaxxers long before covid. They were not smart then either, i agree.

        • Błażejko
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          OK, I was thinking all the time that anti vaxexxers are just anti COVID thing … ok got it

  • Błażejko
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -472 months ago

    why antivaxed ? Maybe vaxed and brain was just broken. I know, You can hate me for that , who cares :P We are going to die someday :D

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      yeah , and what . is punctuation for anyway ???,…!!?,

      • Błażejko
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -162 months ago

        Probably is needed but English is not my main language. Sorry for your biggest problem…btw …this is just punctuation.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          I wouldn’t have said anything, but you were also been an enormous twit.