No, Anarchism is one of the approaches one can take when we acknowledge that there are bad actors, and that there is no magic method to make everyone get along. If there were such magic, there would be no need for Anarchism.

Uh, is it? I’ve got my fair share of disputes with anarchists, but most of the ones I’ve spoken to acknowledge that there will still be bad actors and necessary restraints against those same folks.

Libertarian socialism is a synonym for anarchism; best not take anarchy in the colloquial sense. The point of anarchists is not no rule, but no rulers (ie no distinct, rigid hierarchy).

I didn’t vote for you