One of the only things I find myself missing about reddit is the videos. I’m aware that it’s not really feasible for videos to be hosted on a lemmy instance at the moment, but I’m curious if that might change

  • kadu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be better to integrate with the existing federated video hosting service? (PeerTube) so basically host videos in PeerTube, link to Lemmy, make the Lemmy UI parse it as a video with a custom player

    • @islandofcaucasus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      431 year ago

      I’m still pretty new here so i don’t know how that works, but I just want to see the random crazy person or fight video between memes and news stories

    • @fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Does PeerTube distribute load across instances, like BitTorrent? Or does it assume that the hosting instance has enough bandwidth to support all concurrent users?

      • eh
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        It uses WebTorrent for distribution between viewers watching at the same time which can temporarily help with the load on popular videos, but there still needs to be at least one source instance that’s sharing the video “regularly” (for unpopular or old stuff), which ends up having the same bandwidth issues you’d get with any other video platform.

        • @fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Oh, cool. I expect that means that bandwidth costs should scale sublinearly in number of concurrent viewers of the same video — so 1000 people watching the same video should cost less in bandwidth than 100 people watching 10 videos, or 10 people watching 100 videos.

      • atocci
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        PeerTube uses the WebTorrent protocol for its videos, so it does distribute load with everyone currently watching a video helping distribute it to everyone else. Each instance is its own torrent tracker. I’m not sure how I feel about it, because your IP address is visible to anyone else watching the video also.

      • kadu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’m going to be honest with you, I have absolutely no idea how it works. And as far as I can see, there are very few instances at the moment.

        Though someone smarter than me could probably answer you by checking the source code, or maybe they even have some documentation written already.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Im on kbin and I get videos. Just had to add the endpoints to my no script.

  • @Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Embedded is what you’re looking for I believe, it is currently an imposition (impedance) to host videos on a Lemmy instance.

  • @SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I’m surprised there doesn’t seem to be any way to display a video at least from another source. It’s common on the mastodon side.

  • Annoyed_🦀 A
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    Weird thing is Lemmy is able to embed mp4 but couldn’t for youtube. c/videos will be awesome with that embed feature.

    • FartsWithAnAccent
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      They could just let us use embed code like this:

      <iframe width=“560” height=“315” src=“https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/oHg5SJYRHA0” title=“YouTube video player” frameborder=“0” allow=“accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” allowfullscreen></iframe>

      Doesn’t have to be hosted on the instance.

    • eh
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Storage space is one issue. Bandwidth (how many TB/mo goes out the server) is another. And for any “serious” use case transcoding would also be important (so you can keep the other two down for everyone except Apple users who are stubborn to adopt VP9/AV1, and to provide multiple quality options), which unlike the other two requires powerful hardware most instances do not have.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Because it’s a data hog for mobile users, but mostly because it’s intrusive to the browsing experience.

        • @ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So having an image/thumbnail with a “play” button is intrusive? I can see how some people might find it annoying (or perhaps even intrusive), but we already have embedded images which are exactly the same until pressed.

            • @ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              That’s fair.

              In that case, perhaps you (if you find it annoying enough) could open a feature request ticket on your favorite app to “Add option to disable inline/embedded Media”. It appears that you are not the only one with this issue, and I don’t mind having a more complete user experience with more options.

    • @JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If there’s enough people that find it useful, it could at least be an optional setting. It’s really a client thing, though, nothing to do with Lemmy itself.