• @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    648 months ago

    I hate basically all youtube links on Lemmy, it seems like this is “reading” social media, not “watching” social media.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      618 months ago

      I’ve just started downvoting anything that looks like it’s promoting a YouTube channel. I don’t want a five or ten minute video communicating something I can read in thirty seconds.

      • speck
        link
        fedilink
        368 months ago

        Okay so I’m not insane

        I don’t want a five or ten minute video communicating something I can read in thirty seconds.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      288 months ago

      There’s video oriented communities, just like on reddit.

      Otherwise, yeah, exactly. The whole reason I enjoyed the reddit communities was reading not watching or listening.

      • @saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        88 months ago

        Agreed.

        And don’t forget to upvote and favourite this comment. It really helps me make more comments just like this one.

  • chi-chan~
    link
    fedilink
    478 months ago

    I partially disagree. It depends on *why* they sent the link.

    If it’s totally out of nowhere, I agree; if someone asks a question and their channel/video answer the question? Feel free to advertise yourself.

  • @library_napper
    link
    278 months ago

    The only reason advertising was banned on reddit was so they could monetize. If the content is relevant to the community, I don’t care if the person sharing it created it. I appreciate the submission.

    Let the votes decide the quality of the content.

      • @unexpectedteapot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        “Let the votes decide the quality of the content” is capitalist rhetoric that was the start of reddit’s end. It is not an argument, it is not a principle to stand behind, and it most definitely is not a better alternative to guidelines the community can vote on.

    • @CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      I don’t really care if someone shares their own content as a participating member of the community, but these people are dwarfed by those who just spam their links to every community on Lemmy that bares even the slightest amount of relevance.

      • @library_napper
        link
        08 months ago

        You dont know that tho. I have multiple lemmmy accounts. Most if them are anonymous, but when I post my own content, I use my real name.

        The only thing I use my “real name” Lemmy account for is self - promotion, but that doesn’t mean I dont participate with other accounts.

        Folks have the right to anonymity.

        • @CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Why would you run, for example, a programming based YouTube channel, but not want to use that same account when interacting with the community on topics of programming? You have a right to anonymity, but people also have the right to block you if you only use that account to spam links in different communities with no other engagement because there’s nothing to differentiate you from all the bots doing the same thing for different reasons.

          • @library_napper
            link
            08 months ago

            My point is you shouldn’t make assumptions. Just because you can’t track all of my activity doesn’t mean I’m a bot.

            • @CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Why would you expect to get treated any differently by complete strangers online if you do absolutely nothing to differentiate yourself from all the bots spamming the place? What you’re suggesting is that they stop moderating these communities simply because “you shouldn’t make assumptions.”

    • @tenoto9124@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      108 months ago

      There’s some bot that links to piped, but i’d prefer people stop using youtube as a source for information / shilling their channel

      • auth
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        piped often doesnt work for me… not sure why

          • @jeffhykin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Wait it takes forever for you? Like the piped app? Mine has been instant for the last 2 years. Like straight up faster than the Youtube offical app

            • Sume
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              Everytime I used Piped I would deal with buffering lasting an entire year, or the video just outright wouldn’t play (very common on kavin.rocks)

              Invidious doesn’t have this problem but it doesn’t support Sponsorblock and I’m not a big fan of its UI

            • @systemglitch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              38 months ago

              Maybe I’ll try again, could have been a bad day, but my experience was bad enough I could not justify considering it as a viable alternative.

              I thought it was unresponsive until I put my phone down to make some tea, came back and it just then started to play.

              • @jeffhykin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I mean with how many upvotes your comment has, I think it means something is different between my experiences and other people’s. I’m just not sure what the cause of the difference is.

    • @Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Because Privacy isn’t 1 or 0 situation. It is granular thing you may think using YouTube crosses the line but others might not agree.

      We as a community can choose what crosses the line for this community.

      Personally I am fine with YouTube links, there is usually a bot posting a more private link down below if you want. It makes it easy to pick one of the other it isn’t that big of a deal.

  • Infiltrated_ad8271
    link
    fedilink
    248 months ago

    More than posting their own channels or doing it on an anti-privacy website, I am annoyed by the medium itself. Even if it’s a topic of interest, videos can become really tedious depending on the author with no practical way to get around it, plus very little accessibility; it’s always more convenient in text.

    • @library_napper
      link
      28 months ago

      Some would argue it’s more accessible in video format. Personally I think it’s best to write an article and then do a breif video summary that links to the article “for more info”

  • @Lodra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Well I guess I can offer a dissenting opinion on this one. YouTube video links are fine on Lemmy? I like watching a short video or two each day?

    Yes, YouTube sucks for privacy. So I don’t have an account and use Firefox Focus to be anonymous. I do wish there were better alternatives to YouTube.

    I don’t like ads and that includes people advertising a channel. But I haven’t personally seen this happen much on Lemmy. Maybe not all. I guess I don’t see why it needs to be banned.

    Anyone else seeing things this way? Or am I missing something?

    Edit:

    I’ve thought about it more. I think I was indeed missing something. Is the complaint referring to all the posts that contain nothing but a YouTube link?

    If that’s the case, I guess it’s a valid complaint. Doesn’t really bother me though. I just scroll on by the posts that don’t interest me

    • @MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      Somewhat private way to watch YouTube: Piped. I believe the piped bot comments under everything with a YouTube link with an alternative link anyway. Just use that.

    • @library_napper
      link
      18 months ago

      Complerly agreed, except that YouTube has privacy issues if you know how to protect yourself.

      One of the reasons I love YouTube is that there’s no authwall, and there’s tons of alternative front ends… So it’s completely anonymous

  • @Jakdracula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    Yes! That’s why I did a YouTube series about this very issue on my channel, go here and smash that subscribe link and find me on patreon too!

  • OrkneyKomodo
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    I was considering blocking all posts containing youtube links. No-one wants some opionated arse-monger broadcasting to them in bed.

    • @library_napper
      link
      08 months ago

      There are folks on YouTube that cite their sources. Don’t ban the platform just because many of the uses suck.

  • @jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Videos can* provide better privacy explanations (ex: animating asymmetric key exchange) The videos that get posted on here, well…

    How about banning video essays?

    • @library_napper
      link
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This. It depends on the source. Always consider the source.

      Even a video essay can be credible, if they cite their sources

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    Its not the advertising that annoys me. Its the links to YouTube with very little context

  • @PeeGee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 months ago

    Agreed - I just had to block the user that’s been loading up the place with his YT links but that cleaned up my feed quite nicely. Suggest a ban for that one too (didn’t want to name anyone but should be painfully obvious by looking at recent activity).