Scientists develop game-changing vaccine against Lyme disease ticks::Researchers have developed a way to vaccinate people such that the ticks that cause Lyme disease cannot be colonized by the bacteria that cause the disease.

  • @outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Peer-reviewed publication link

    It should be illegal for news articles to report on articles without actually posting the publication link

    Edit: pertinently, I’m not 100% sure that’s the same publication, as there doesn’t obviously even seem to be a journal with the title Microbiota (their citation)

    • @timespace@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Drives me fucking mad. I’m convinced that a lot of articles just read other news outlets articles and regurgitate it.

      There’s almost never source material cited. I agree, should be illegal.

  • @DucktorZee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    This feels oddly fake. No journal of that name, nothing on INRAE (the research institute claimed to have published this). AI generated news? I wouldn’t doubt it. I know that Chat-GPT is very good at making fake scientific summaries (complete with fake references using real names in the field) why not fake science news? Also, the vaccine is for the tick… Not for us to use against the tick. For the tick…

  • @astral_avocado@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    Please just let me go to my local CVS and get this. I’ve considered trying to trick a vet into giving me the one they give dogs (that was originally developed and used for humans but taken off the market for total bullshit reasons) but easier said than done.

    • @aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      351 year ago

      I’ve considered trying to trick a vet into giving me the one they give dogs (that was originally developed and used for humans but taken off the market for total bullshit reasons) but easier said than done.

      “My dog is very sensitive, please set the syringe here…”

      “Sir, this is your own arm.”

      “Whaaaatt?! Really?!! Hahahaha, how could that happen hahahh. Now do it.”

  • @massacre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    ITT: People who didn’t read the article and realize this is a vaccine they inject the ticks with and is more about proving how the disease works in the ticks gut biome than any human trials. We’ve had human vaccines for many years, but they were pulled from the market. Yet dogs can get a vaccine today.

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      No dog also gets a pill every months and it makes her blood toxic to tics so we just pull dead tics off her. They die before they can regurgitate and get the dog sick.

    • @wahming
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Why were they pulled from the market?

  • @Vetinari@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For those that spend a lot of time outdoors this is a good thing. I know if at least one influencer that almost died due to Lyme desease. She just released av update video on it.

    https://youtu.be/tCYpw9cnD7Y

    I definitely worry about it but love being out in the woods. Sounds like a good option to me.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    2 days ago we pulled 12 ticks off our son and 34 off our dog after a forest walk. My brother in law got a bullseye last week and is being treated for to. This would change everything!!!

  • @Sh4d0w_H34rt@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    The ticks were horrible last year for me, even had to be treated for Lyme disease. Glad they’re making progress on this.

  • @shaelz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    This makes no sense… by the way vaccines for Lyme have been around for 10yrs. This doesn’t make sense unless you can mass vaccinate ticks.

  • @PotjiePig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 year ago

    This L4sBot reposts way too much old content from Reddit. Do we really just want to populate Lemmy with old content? It’s really killing this sub for me.

    • @voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      7-27 was 3 days ago. That’s old to you? I highly doubt that anything about this story has changed over the weekend…

  • BlitzFitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -71 year ago

    I don’t care if this is don’t peer reviewed yet or not.

    This is HUGE in terms of future potential.

    Within our lifetime we will have so many advances in terms of vaccines and drugs to prevent mass debilitating and death diseases, due to new technologies available.

    Woo! Let’s go science?

  • @jerkjaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2101 year ago

    Let’s be real here. Do we really need a vaccine for this? An estimated 200k people get this per year. It is almost never fatal. People can go years without even knowing or being diagnosed with Lyme disease.

    I am not anti-vax, but A LOT of people clearly are. Maybe we should spend more time focusing on treatment or symptom reduction for those afflicted than vaccines and prevention for all people over non life threatening diseases.

      • @jerkjaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -831 year ago

        Not for all ailments, but for this yes.

        I recommend checking out the CDC information or numerous other studies on Lyme disease and taking your own position rather than blindly excepting a random article on social media as truth and the only acceptable opinion.

        • @deranger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Detection and treatment of Lyme is notoriously difficult. Why would you not prefer a preventive solution?

        • @Meltbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          I suggest you read the research papers on Lyme and form your own decision too. The CDC is hardly comprehensive.

          Like the fact that the infection can actually remain dormant and undetectable in people for long periods of time.

          I’m also pretty sure the estimates on number of people who get Lyme per year vary wildly depending on who you want to believe.

          Actually here is the cdc saying 476k

          https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/humancases.html#:~:text=Q%3A CDC also states that,is this number so different%3F

          Anyways. Lyme is a tricky one because not everyone has a reaction and it’s impossible to say how many people are carrying it dormant.

        • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          The fact that they put effort into making a vaccine makes it pretty clear what the medical community’s position is.

          • @catsan@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Well, yes and and no. If the medical community was free to choose and not utterly dependant on financing from pharmaceutical and other companies, there’d be a ton more vaccines and medications available already. This stuff is really going downhill since the 80s.

          • @Meltbox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            People often forget what the medical research and medical authorities say are not always the same.

            See heart disease for another one of these fun ones.

        • @There1snospoon7491@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I see the points you’re making.

          I still disagree with your position.

          If the vast majority of people also disagree with you, would you still hold your position on this?

    • @Bop@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      781 year ago

      If we can prevent a disease with very little chance of minor side effects, then yes, we should prevent the disease. Lyme disease really fucked up a lot of people’s lives.

    • Pelicanen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 year ago

      From the Wikipedia page:

      If untreated, symptoms may include loss of the ability to move one or both sides of the face, joint pains, severe headaches with neck stiffness or heart palpitations. Months to years later, repeated episodes of joint pain and swelling may occur. Occasionally, shooting pains or tingling in the arms and legs may develop. Despite appropriate treatment, about 10 to 20% of those affected develop joint pains, memory problems, and tiredness for at least six months.

    • Lantern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 year ago

      This is an idiotic argument. Lyme disease can cause extensive and chronic suffering. A cold is rarely fatal, but if you were going to live for a year with one, you’d probably be miserable.

      Anything that can make a positive change in our lives should be regarded as exactly that. Yes, there are other problems out there, but sometimes we need to invest into smaller ones to better how we are able to deal with the larger ones. Disease research and study is a perfect example of this, as better understanding builds a pathway to future successes.

    • @qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      This is the dumbest opinion I’ve read in a while. I know three people with Lyme disease. One of them is a kid whose face drops on one side if they get too tired. And they are tired all the time because of having Lyme disease.

    • @dfc09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      My wife has suffered from post Lyme disease effects for the last decade. Yes we need a vaccine for this.

      We’re kinda past the point where ONLY lethal diseases need to be prevented, yeah?

    • always_gone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      This vaccine may not even be used on humans. It could also be used on other hosts of ticks and may lead to a potential future where the disease gets eradicated.

      It’s always easy to say it’s not important until you’re affected yourself.

      • Rev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        This right here is very interesting.

    • @HollowNotion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Just because it probably won’t kill you doesn’t mean it doesn’t lead to debilitating health issues, which we could solve for if we simply vaccinate against it. Let the anti-vaxxers take their lives in to their own hands, but don’t stop medical advancement because of them, for fucks sake.

    • @notacat@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It is difficult to detect and can cause debilitating chronic issues. Why on earth would you not support preventing this disease?

    • @Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      This comment ignores that not all vaccines are prophylactic. Often times a vaccine can be administered after infection to cure or suppress symptoms of the disease. Rabies vaccine is exactly this. This comment is unhinged levels of not understanding the importance of this scientific achievement.

    • 🦄🦄🦄
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I hope you’ll get Lyme disease. Don’t worry, it’s not that bad after all.

    • @Vetinari@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      For those that spend a lot of time outdoors this is a good thing. I know if at least one influencer that almost died due to Lyme desease. She just released av update video on it.

      https://youtu.be/tCYpw9cnD7Y

      I definitely worry about it but love being out in the woods. Sounds like a good option to me.

    • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yes. Some people who get it really suffer.

      Also, if the accountants and bean counters at the pharma company think they can make enough money to recover costs, maybe they know more about the demand and importance than us. Just a thought.

    • @Vetinari@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      For those that spend a lot of time outdoors this is a good thing. I know if at least one influencer that almost died due to Lyme desease. She just released av update video on it.

      https://youtu.be/tCYpw9cnD7Y

      I definitely worry about it but love being out in the woods. Sounds like a good option to me.

    • @unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      As someone who plays the check all my skin game when I go outside and pull off at least 4 nymphs… yes