It’s not?

From Downunder. It’s not really taught that much, if at all. From my experience (may vary), we know the basics like, War of Independence, George Washington, Constitution etc; but it doesn’t go much deeper than that.

I’m guessing generally most countries have their own history to teach, and unless it was something more global (WWI, WWII), or you specifically took History in High School, it wouldn’t go much further than that.

Argentinian here. The American Revolution is presented as one of the causes of the Argentine War of Independence.

Canada here. Basically, everything I learned is from parodies. American history is not a big deal in K-12 curriculum. If i had to write a 2 paragraph essay to save my life:

It was a period in history where guns were loaded one ball at a time by stuffing it down the barrel with a stick. Wealthy white people who profited off slavery all lived in the southern states for some reason. This group started to hear that other people in the rest of the (northern) states were starting to talk about making slavery illegal. To protect their interests they formed a separate government, formed an army and attempted to overtake and rule all of the states.

Their army wore red, and the north’s defending army wore blue. They shot at each other with cannons for a few years and many people died, mostly from shitty health-care and infections rather than acute death. The north won and now lots of people who were never in the war, pretend to have the war again to remind them to never have a civil war.

I’d say the impact was that slavery was abolished, but it was abolished in many other countries without a civil war so I guess the impact was a lot of parody material for pop culture.

And that is all I know about Paul Revere and the American Revolution.

Canadian. I’m not sure it’s even taught in Canadian schools other than “Americans revolted against Britan while Canadians stayed loyal to the empire. We obtained independence diplomatically instead of through revolution” and “United Empire Loyalist” means the person’s family was American but fled to Canada in order to stay in the empire instead of join the revolutionaries.

I only learned about why Canadians stayed loyal after school by researching it myself. The high taxes imposed by the king didn’t affect northern colonies as much as it did our southern neighbours. Also, Britian would have had a much easier time with a naval invasion of Canada if they needed to squash a revolution (which is why the French settlers of Quebec didn’t rebel even though France assisted the American revolutionaries).

It isn’t whatsoever in Poland

As someone who didn’t take history beyond the age of… 14? I learned precisely nothing about the American Revolution

Australian. Al that I know about that event was learnt from reddit conversations 😂

Malaysian here, it’s never taught here.

It is mentioned, mostly because the norwegian constitution takes inspiration from the american and the french ones. Though as revolutions go, the american one is considerably less covered than (one of) the french or russian ones.

I’m from Canada, we learned about it as part of a general colonization and exploration lessons.

Germany: I got 45 min in History (Advanced course/‘Leistungskurs’), 3 10 min presentations in English class. Short story: “Lincoln didn’t like slavery, States seceded, war, North won, L. abolished slavery formally, got shot, racism persisted.”

UK. I don’t think it’s taught at all. we learn about early colonies, puritans, and about the slave trade, but not the Revolution.

Grew up in the UK in the 80s and 90s, and had comprehensive education on US history, including the Revolution. Also learned about the slave trade and the civil war, and then politics right up until the 20th century. May have helped that my home town had a small, but important role in early colonization.

From Latin America.

It was kind of like a blurb in the text book, basically.

But it gives context to other revolutions going on in the Americas before.