Whenever I see threads and comments about privacy-related or sensitive topics, I often see concerns about China in particular stealing all that data.

Why is China, a country across a vast ocean, is seen as a bigger threat in that regard than US itself? Unlike Chinese, the local government does have power over its residents and can actually use this information against you (and it does have a record for doing exactly that). The only places where Chinese espionage would be a concern (military, high-tech industry) lay way beyond what an everyday American faces regularly.

So, is it a new red scare, or is there a substance behind it that I fail to see?

  • @rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    212 months ago

    Both. China is where most consumer tech comes from, and the rest often includes parts from China as well. Taiwan has TSMC which makes all the big CPUs, but honestly all the small stuff like consumer electronics comes mostly out of China. If they did want to integrate some sort of spying they would have the opportunity, and in the past individual threats to the state of many countries have had supply chain attacks carried out, so it is not an unfounded fear.

    That all said, China is run by the CCP, an ostensibly Communist party, so red scare, not to mention Chinese, so racism, and Party, because Americans are against fun, or at least in government they seem to be. China also has an abysmal record on human rights, though coming from anyone in the west criticism is somewhat hypocritical given prison labour, proping up dictatorships, coups, exploiting slave labour, and so on. Nobody is doing a perfect job, nobody is saintly, but there are fair and unfair criticisms against China as a nation state and those do inform some of the fear of their potential for spying.

    Now TikTok, Reddit, Meta, etc… There are the really scary tools with far too little attention.

      • @rowinxavier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Yeah, the whole “China is doing propaganda using TikTok” line is kind of like saying Russia is using bots on YouTube. Like, yeah, maybe, sure, but focussing all your efforts on one single platform and ignoring the rest is silly. As the red team you would use as many different platforms as possible, make sure your disinformation output was broad and came from multiple, even opposing, ideological positions, and absolutely swamp the information space with junk. If nothing is reliable people don’t approach things carefully, they just check out. Once people check out it is a win.

      • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Tencent owns 11% of Reddit. Reddit is primarily a US propaganda operation.

        Tiktok is wholly owned by a Chinese company, but unlike the rest of the world, the US version is hosted and managed entirely within the US, this (along with hiring a bunch of spooks and killing controversial things in the algo like BLM) was done in response to the Trump administration trying to come up with excuses to ban it.

        • @rowinxavier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Yep, and the while thing is moot anyway because use of the systems does not require ownership, so while the owners can exert more pressure on the algorithm and change what shows up other actors can do the same a little less easily on each platform. Propaganda is alive and well, so maybe try to limit yourself somewhat to a smaller group of people you actually know in person and be critical of information coming in.

          • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            be critical of information coming in

            The atomic unit of propaganda isn’t lies, it’s emphasis. Most propaganda doesn’t take the form of false information, but true facts spun in a certain way to build/reinforce a specific worldview in the viewer.

  • @Railing5132@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    202 months ago

    I manage the IT for a SMB in the non-profit mental health space, and am connected through another role to our state’s cybersecurity fusion center. My small, insignificant network has scanning attempts run on it a few thousand times a day. Several hundred times a day we will log attacks from various vectors. Looking at the stats every month, going back a decade, the source of all of these is: #1) Russia, #2) China. Every. Time. We present a fat ransomware target, but have no IP to steal, so why the interest? A couple of reasons, courtesy of the fusion center and the local FBI office: first, supply chain attacks: we are partnered with larger medical groups, insurance companies, the state government, and research universities, and using trusted connections to get into those upstream entities is sometimes easier than attacking the front door. I have a small security budget comparatively. Second: botnets/zombies: taking over systems from within the US and making your traffic domestic, or even local to your target helps obfuscate the source of the attack, and ultimately why everyone should care. Not just about China, but about security in general - unpatched home PCs have been used to host and distribute malware, spam and even CP. I certainly wouldn’t want that on my home network. Even if someone didn’t care about that, Americans can be trusted to fall back on: “they’re taking something of yours” - they’re using your bandwidth and you’re paying for it. I believe the Chinese citizens just want the same things American, German, Bulgarian, and East Elbonian citizens want - to live life and be happy (in our parlance; “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”). But the Chinese government however, has a 100-year plan to be the sole economic power in the world, and the way they’re trying to get there isn’t playing nicely in the sandbox.

  • @zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    182 months ago

    We’ve had our spray nozzle copied by the Chinese. Industrial espionage is not just high tech.

    Chinese espionage does not benefit you in any way. The preferred amount for citizens and governments would be zero.

    Domestic spying surveillance (can be argued) prevent/catch crimes. So some level of surveillance the benefit of less crime is worth the intrusion to the average citizen.

    • @Allero@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      -102 months ago

      For citizens, there are other factors at play. For example, Chinese companies stealing American technologies could lead to the former being able to produce something for cheap, which, if tariffs wouldn’t get involved, will allow an everyday person to have a better bargain.

      • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 months ago

        Chinese companies stealing American technologies could lead to the former being able to produce something for cheap, which, … will allow an everyday person to have a better bargain.

        While the company that originally created the product will collapse, putting people out of work and weakening the American economy.

        That’s basically what the globalization movement from the 1980s and 90s was. Jobs may move overseas, but think of the cheap shit you can buy!The hollowing out of Western economies has led to the political moment we’re in now.

        • @Allero@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          -12 months ago

          Do I?

          Of course I am aware that moving industry abroad has the potential to reduce the amount of local jobs and taxes, while also shifting the trade balance between the countries.

          But, as things stand, the only thing keeping many American industries afloat is protectionist policies, which gradually degrade industry’s ability to be price-competitive even further. This is not sustainable, and there should be other approaches - otherwise, the American economy is a slow bomb.

          And for all that circus, a regular American has to pay. A lot. In some industries, this literally leads to goods being sold for twice or more of their actual worth.

  • geekwithsoul
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    I mean, the subject of “Chinese Espionage in the United States” has a fairly lengthy page all of its own on Wikipedia with examples and concerns. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_espionage_in_the_United_States

    Probably one of the most notable examples:

    Between 2010 and 2012, intelligence breaches led to Chinese authorities dismantling CIA intelligence networks in the country, killing and arresting a large number of CIA assets within China.[43] A joint CIA/FBI counterintelligence operation, codenamed “Honey Bear”, was unable to definitively determine the source of the compromises, though theories include the existence of a mole, cyber-espionage, compromise of Hillary Clinton’s illicit classified email server as noted by the intelligence community inspector general,[44] or poor tradecraft.[43]Mark Kelton, then the deputy director of the National Clandestine Service for Counterintelligence, was initially skeptical that a mole was to blame.[43]

    In January 2018, a former CIA officer named Jerry Chun Shing Lee[note 1] was arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport, on suspicion of helping dismantle the CIA’s network of informants in China.[47][48]

    And that’s just one we all know about. Not to mention a rich history of Chinese state-sponsored corporate espionage and a history of let’s say playing fast and loose with international norms, human rights, etc.

    • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -92 months ago

      I don’t see why China catching CIA agents would concern Americans. Most Americans are not CIA agents inside China.

      • geekwithsoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        It’s more the fact they were running a mole in the CIA. If you want an example of more direct action, how does this one work for you (from just this week):

        https://www.theregister.com/AMP/2024/09/25/chinas_salt_typhoon_cyber_spies/

        In a related security advisory, government agencies accused the Flax Typhoon crew of amassing a SQL database containing details of 1.2 million records on compromised and hijacked devices that they had either previously used or were currently using for the botnet

        Back in February, the US government confirmed that this same Chinese crew comprised"multiple" US critical infrastructure orgs’ IT networks in America in preparation for “disruptive or destructive cyberattacks” against those targets.

  • Annoyed_🦀 A
    link
    162 months ago

    Not a US citizen, but i guess no one like their data get send to foreign country, especially the authoritarian one, just like China doesn’t want their citizens data get send to US. It’s really just both side very aware of what the other can do and will do, especially after seeing what russian can do in 2016 US election.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While a certain extent of it is just paranoia, there’s also the fact that China as a nation has a long standing arrogance about how it views others that the Xi regime seems a little too eager to return to.

    A rather infamous incident involving the guy who basically is China’s founding father and great liberator revolved around him being kidnapped by Qing agents in London, because the imperial throne had long presumed that their authority was absolute everywhere, and saw zero reason why they should consider not arresting someone on another country’s soil.

    I bring this incident up because it’s what the legitimate security concern actually revolves around, China has begun dispatching “police agents” to their embassies who are basically there to kidnap and intimidate chinese nationals who aren’t acting “chinese enough”, and in extreme cases drag them back to beijing by their hair.

    This obviously extends to dissidents who foolishly presumed they could escape Beijing’s wrath by not living in China, and to anyone seen as aiding and abetting them who aren’t high profile enough to draw attention if they get roughed up or even kidnapped themselves.

    American privacy invaders are looking at you, chinese privacy invaders are parasitically attaching themselves into your eye sockets so they can look at everyone you’re looking at, and use you as an unwitting informant on anyone they’re tracking.

    It’s like that bug that eats and then replaces fishes’ tongues, only if the bug was big brother and you were hyptnotized into staring at some shitty minecraft parkour while it eats your eyeball out and plugs itself into your optic nerve.

    TikTok of course advertises this as a fun feature that encourages group viewing by presenting content based on your interests and also the interests of those around you “as a conversation starter.”

  • I can’t speak for other Americans (USA, in particular, which is who I assume you meant), but for me it’s the nature of the oligarchical regime and their views on individualism. I’ve read the Chinese CSL, and spent a couple of days in a session presented by international lawyers and security professionals explaining what it meant for our business, how we needed to navigate it, and how it was being implemented. It’s scary.

    Information is power; specific information about you is power over you. It’s control.

    As for the government, I think it’s more a matter of the fact that China is far more well positioned and equipped to surveil US assets. Russia is bumbling, pre-occupied, and doesn’t make any computer components we use. Chinese chips, on the other hand, are in everything. The US is worried that, in a conflict, we could discover that China is able to simply… turn off all of the F35s. Or shut down or coopt firing systems on our war ships. Or disable coms or NV gear of ground troops. All of our modern equipment is computerized to more or lesser degree, and the failure of even seemingly simple resisters, sourced from China, could result in misoperation of gear, at best. If the espionage is more sophisticated, with more important components, it’s conceivable China could locate and monitor assets; missiles which ignore counter measures and always hit because the target is broadcasting a homing signal.

    Most off these hypotheticals are probably not within the realm of current technology, and that what access China is able to embed in computer components is far more limited. But we don’t really know, and it’s far more dangerous to underestimate than to overestimate capabilities.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    Suppose you were Superman and China was Lex Luthor. Would you feel comfortable with China knowing you were weak to kryptonite?

  • @jimmy90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    62 months ago

    the five eyes nations are all worried about china

    it’s mostly about stealing industrial and military secrets but i don’t think they see china as an offensive threat

    • @fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      offensive threat

      The CCP regularly, overtly threatens Taiwan and is aggressive with many of its other neighbors (e.g., ramming fishing boats).

          • @grff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            Yeah that makes sense , they certainly have a lot of fodder to throw around like we are seeing with Russia now…

            • @fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              Well, Russia actually doesn’t have a lot of fodder to throw around. They’re facing a demographic crisis even without the Kremlin’s barbaric war.

              China’s population is almost ten times larger.

  • @treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    We (the US) off-shored our manufacturing labor to China because of cheap labor. We were able to continue to reap much of the benefits of this production with our intellectual property (trade secrets, patents, etc).

    China will inevitably catch up in the IP game and have been quickly doing so, often through corporate espionage, sending students to study in Western schools, and just from experience building most of these physical goods.

    It’s IP theft and seen as cheating. And will erode the US IP dominance faster than we’d like.

    I’m pretty on the fence over it as an American personally. IP laws in general are kind of bullshit but also, we’re on our back foot economically because we have no infrastructure to build anymore. And if we no longer have the IP dominance, we have zero economic leverage.

    And all that’s ignoring all the governmental and civic espionage that has other uncomfortable implications.

  • @exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    02 months ago

    Because China is the new Russia Commie menace

    The USA pretends to care about espionage but has zero trouble allowing all of its manufacturing to flee there. As long as the big boys are making money, it’s worth every risk, amiright?

  • @alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    -82 months ago

    There are two considerations.

    For the American government and corporations, Chinese espionage is an obvious and real threat. NVidia doesn’t want China to steal their chip designs and the Pentagon doesn’t want China to steal military info.

    For American private citizens, it isn’t really a threat. It’s actually preferable in a way, because you know they won’t disclose whatever they learn to the American government. You might even consider buying a fully “designed and made in China” device, which the NSA might not have a backdoor to.

    This only makes it more concerning to the American government, because they lose control over their citizens.

    • @aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      The threat to American citizens is that they are steered away from their own interests and the interest of furthering democracy throughout the world because they see a curated feed that excludes information critical of China and amplifies information that promotes China as a country of harmony, peace, and prosperity.

      And in some cases, the trends amplified on Chinese social media apps directly fuel American political division.

  • Autonomous User
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -14
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Their media is filled will propaganda, plus so little thought they can’t realise it’s easier for the US to attack you in the US than China to attack you in the US.