• @jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Once the lead gets promoted for global impact, nobody else cares. There’s nobody to maintain it, there’s nobody to develop it. If you work on somebody else’s project it’s hard to claim you had global impact.

      What we’re seeing is promotion culture as seen by products. Nobody’s getting promoted running the old thing.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is a widespread problem in tech companies. Maintainers of existing code don’t get enough recognition. Often that work is more difficult than building new applications from scratch. But the person who builds a nice snappy prototype that can’t be scaled is hailed by management as a genius, while those who have to do the difficult work of developing it to a production ready state and maintaining it are seen as slow.

        I’m not bitter. Oh wait, I am bitter.

  • SSUPII
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    BREAKING: Google yet again sells hardware that becomes e-waste 2 years later!

  • @DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Google Groups, according to a random internet stranger who claimed to work at Google - they use it internally and so won’t kill it.

  • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    They’re probably going to replace it with Google Duo. Oh wait.

    Maybe they’ll replace Google Meet with Google Meet again.

  • @pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The point is to use messaging apps as a data collection vector. Once they hit user saturation, they shut it down. That’s what all their product shutdowns are about: they run out of useful analytics.