• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I feel like a + shaped screw head would be as standard as a pyramid if multiple civilizations had developed screws independently. It wouldn’t be the last kind, but it would be there somewhere. Maybe even a long, long time ago.

    • @Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      There are at least 3 standards for the + shape already. Phillips, Pozidrive, and Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS). They do not play well together.

      insert obligatory xkcd standards reference

      • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This bugs me so much more than it should. Why do we have three different standards for + shaped screws? You know what doesn’t have this problem? Flatheads. There’s exactly one way to make a flathead screwdriver, and I won’t be looking it up to make sure I’m right

        I see that multiple people have replied, but unfortunately reading these comments would be a form of research so I must decline

        • @Botzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Should the slot be partial or go all the way through? If partial, is that standard for the size of the screw, or universal?

          How wide should the slot be? Should that change based on the size of the screw?

          How deep should the slot be?

          Should the sides of the slot be perfectly straight, or angled to perfectly fit the wedge shape of the driver? If angled, what angle?

          Should the bottom of the slot be perfectly flat or slightly rounded so a coin or something could be used in a pinch? If rounded, what radius?

          Should the top of the screw be perfectly flat, or domed, or raised?

          Should the bottom of the head be flat, angled (at which angle), smooth, rough.

          Should we use metric or freedom units for the thread pitch?

          Should the threads go all the way to the head?

          Should the point of the screw be flat or tapered (at what angle)?

          Ok, only the first half of those were about the driver used, but I’m sure there are things I missed in that!

        • @ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Their isn’t one way to make a flat head screwdriver. Some a chisel and some are slots. The slotted ones are better but more expensive.

          Both still slip from the screw and are a pain to manually screw (slotted less so).

          Pozi is the best + type screw. It’s pretty much standard for UK construction. The only time a different type is used is sometimes Phillips for plaster board or external hex and internal torx for long or large screws.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13 months ago

      I think a single slotted screw head would be more universal and easy. You just cut one line into the top of the screw head and your ready to go. A Philips head would need to be cut twice and once you did, you’ve weakened the head one degree more by removing more material

      • @SirSamuel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        You clearly haven’t had to screw a flathead screw.

        Anyone that’s dicked around with those little bastards starts hating life after about thirty seconds. A fastener I can screw in a without having to be perfectly in line with the shaft? Yes please! I don’t care if it’s a shitty Phillips screw, sign me up. I’d even take those goofy square Canadian screws. Hell, anything is better than flathead.

        I challenge you to find a screw worse to use than a flathead screw.

      • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Ohhh no… As a person who regularly builds random shit for film and television, the single slotted screw is the bane of my bloody existence. Some designers fucking love em for the aesthetic but the cam outs on them are terrible. Is it technically easier to produce? Yes, is it viable to use for construction purposes comparitively - fuck no. Every time you cam out ( lose traction on the screw) you risk accidentally damaging whatever medium you are screwing into.

        Locally there is an insane institutional preference for the Robertson screw (which is basically a square) because it doesn’t cam out much, drives in well and arguably resists stripping better than a Phillips… This is believed in so much that any screw not seen by the camera is a Robby (usually size 2) while anything that is perceived by the audience is a phillips or a single slot screw. Given a choice nobody wants to handle single slots and chances are good you only find them in period specific builds or when the designer is a psychopath.

    • MacN'CheezusOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      That may have been the actual post title I was looking for.

  • kamen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Ironically enough other standards appeared because of the need of more torque.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13 months ago

      As an American, we made a mistake in not adopting those. Torx or whatever isn’t even as good.

      • @Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        Torx is better than whatever this Canadian abomination is. You’d only put pressure on the corners in a realistic setting. These would get rounded so fast unless they are massive, like on some differentials or gearbox oil drains.

        • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          This guy mechanics

          Indeed torx is so good because it attempts to maximize the surface where pressure is applied to. This is good on smaller sized bolts that are more prone to being rounded, but especially amazing when removing bolts that may have been exposed and potentially corroded

            • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah, hex is very nice but torx is improvement over it.

              I have not checked on it, but I’m like 97.25% sure wood screws jumped from Philips to torx however because of corrosion resistance. Hex is very easy to round already as is on smaller sizes, but even more so if the head is exposed to elements and corroded. Of course material matters a lot, but even stainless corrodes over time.

              Torx has to be very, very bad condition for it to round, it’s more likely for the screw to snap

              Sorry for drunk rambling but I really like bolts. And bearings for what it’s worth

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Never had or seen a stripped Robertson, they are robust AF. Don’t ask me the physics. (They go deep into the screw head because of the simple shape, maybe that has part of it. And they are tapered, it’s not just a square, so they manage to grip the bit like a mofo. You don’t cam out of a Robertson.)

          • @Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            I’ve snapped so many Robertson bits in my life. Screws are fine.

            1 5/8" cement board screws

            They used to be Robertson. They switched to Torx.

            Night and day difference

            Like you said, they do grip like a mofo, and with an impact driver, the bits snap.

            I tried dozens of different brands of bits. Even paid top dollar for special Milwaukee ones.

            I was at a point where I had to pre-drill and counter sink the screws because I was breaking too many bits.

            I could probably drive a torx head one through a board

          • @anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Torx bits are waaaay stronger than hex. Like double the surface area and tapered to work when corroded.

            My 30 year old VW axles with hex bolts were a nightmare. The new ones are all Torx or 12pt.

            I ended to driving an oversized Torx but into the nearly stripped hex bolts to finally remove them.

  • @FringeTheory999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    Why wouldn’t they? It’s an efficient design, and aside from the whole force thing they seem to be working with the same physics that we are. Why wouldn’t they invent philips head screws?

      • @_bcron@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Torx is cool and all but all the touted virtues such as less cam-out go out the window if you have to drive them in at wonky angles, like tight fitting spaces. If you gotta angle the driver it’s not gonna seat well at all, apt to jump and wear out your bit. And if your only T20 rolls away and falls under a deck, yuck, 10mm problems.

        Phillips has a place and that place is ‘a wonky place to hold a power drill’. That said I’m a huge fan of square head because it’s a happy medium between those two

        • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Angled screws only work halfway well with Pozidriv or Torx, standard Phillips slip too.

          Btw, why is Torq-set or Tri-wing so uncommon? They seem the best mechanically.

          Edit: no way to change image size in markdown?

          Efitedit: why does this exist? Oval

      • AtHeartEngineer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Square (Robertson) and/or torx depending on application. Square should be for everyday things and torx should be for anything mechanical, yes I know there is a big gray area in the middle there, but flat head, phillips, and hex need to go.

        • @blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          I have never in my life seen such a screw. Hexagon is the shit here, when it isnt Phillips. Maybe coming from Ikea, I don’t know. Is this format a (popular) US thing?

          • AtHeartEngineer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Ya Ikea standardized on hex because it’s cheap to mass produce. It definitely strips though.

            Torx has slowly been gaining popularity in the US for a decade or two now, but sadly Phillips is still pretty popular and hex is pretty common also, you will see the square/Robertson screws a lot in electrical panels and in cabinetry but not super common at the hardware store.

    • @WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -13 months ago

      I don’t get the problem with flathead, for household applications it seems the most superior because I can use literally anything in my house to drive the screw (butter knife, credit card, a housekey)

      plus almost every size of flathead screwdriver can fit in almost every size of flathead screw.

      • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No offense, but you haven’t unscrewed/screwed enough slot screws if you don’t see why they’re worse in every way. The criteria for a good screw isn’t that you don’t have to have the correct tool. The bits are $0.99!

        I unscrew a single screw and whether it’s a light switch or an electronic device, I’m already annoyed. Even if you use a flathead screwdriver that fits perfectly, it will un-center and slip out, whether you use a hand bit/screw driver or a drill.

      • @fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        You can use everything, but everything works badly. Even a fitting screwdriver will just randomly jump out after half a turn and scratch whatever you’re working on.