• coyotino [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    why are these people leaving? they should force the government to fire them and make a big stink about it.

    • Pete Hahnloser
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s generally referred to as “a principled stance.” The same result will happen either way; this way, you get to tell your kids you made the right choice.

      • coyotino [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        to me, the more principled stance would be to stay and resist until they are forced to fire you, which makes them look bad. I would have no qualms about telling my kids I made the right choice in that scenario. But others have pointed out that doing this might lead to a career civil servant losing their retirement benefits, and I can understand that that is a lot to throw away for resistance actions that will ultimately change very little.

    • @itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      Probably has something to do with retirement funds. If you have been paying into the system for 30+ years you need that money when you retire and don’t want to see it wiped out or reduced if you are fired.

      Being principled in government jobs has a high cost.

      • coyotino [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        this makes a lot of sense to me. I can understand choosing to resign if this is the case.

    • @millie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      … One could say the same of participation in the electoral process. Taking your ball and going home doesn’t work any better as a voter than as an official.

      • coyotino [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        i don’t really agree that “one could say the same” because these are totally different situations. A voter is not a civil servant. A voter does not get paid to vote. Most voters did not swear an oath to defend the constitution (unless they are a naturalized citizen). A single voter also has no power to block an insurgent force from taking over key government systems, unlike a civil servant.

        • @King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Also a voters pay and retirement benefits are not likely to be impacted by how they vote. Civil service it can make a huge difference in the long run if you retire vs get dismissed.

        • @jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          A single voter has(had) the power to join other single voters.
          Most civil servants have little power against an AR.

          • @elfpie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            Is this being dismissive? You presented your point of view and they presented theirs. A nice exchange. You don’t have to agree and you don’t have to answer, but this end felt like an eye roll.

  • Radioactive Butthole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    Jesus fuckin christ. Quitting still gets them what they want. Force them to fire you and be an obstructionist little shit the whole way out.

    • @King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      As much as that is a wonderful sentiment. Retirement vs firing might make a substantial difference in their quality of life i. Retirement whereas getting fired is a symbolic gesture that may or may not have any impact at all. I can understand trying to make sure that personally you come out as on as possible.