You know, DOGE, fascist president and corporations dictating what people can do, institutions being ruined, laws being ignored. Is there any way out of that or is it over? Is the USA done?

  • @TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1594 months ago

    In the short term: Yes. Unless the US military decides to remove a sitting president but that is extremely unlikely.

    In the long term: Yes, but also no. Fascism is extremely inefficient and expensive and the US is destroying its own economy and pushing away all of its allies and former trade partners. Things will get very rough but it will not last forever. There will be a lot of rebuilding that needs to be done.

    Unfortunately this has been a long time coming. The United States has never really been united and it was only a matter of time before another possible civil war loomed on the horizon.

    • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      I would say it’s been coming since BEFORE the civil war.

      People always take my words out of context when I say that life in general would have been better for everyone long term if the south won.

      People take that to mean that I’m pro-slavery. I’m not. If the south won, slavery would have died out naturally by the early 1900s (assuming confederate america lasted that long)

      But if the south had won, and been able to leave the union? I feel like they’d have made the worst possible choices for their country on a repeated basis. I feel like their country would have crumbled and disolved into multiple smaller countries. The united states would have continued expanding out west. Texas is probably the only former state that wouldn’t have crumbled.

      The rest of the confederate states? They’d be struggling to survive, last in the world in education, terrible healthcare, basically a bunch of 3rd world countries. But the rest of the USA? SO MUCH HEALTHIER FOR IT!!! All these cancers trying to tear down OUR country today, wouldn’t be part of our country. They can go fuck up the country of Alabama. Go nuts.

      The pure amount of butterfly effect policies that would be different is mind blowing.

      To me, the south winning isn’t about slavery. It’s about taking this large lump sum of the worst people in the country, and cutting them free like you cut away a tumor to get rid of cancer.

        • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          294 months ago

          I mean it’s very obviously speculation because nobody has a crystal ball to see the outcome of decisions that never happened. It’s just an interesting thought experiment and something to ponder.

      • @Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        134 months ago

        On the one hand… First World War would’ve ended very differently.

        On the other… Maybe eugenics would already be discredited by the 20s with how it went in Dixie.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -24 months ago

          I mean WWI was salty Europeans fighting salty Europeans over European salt. Nothing for America to get involved in.

          • @Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            134 months ago

            I didn’t even mention the Second World War, because the first would’ve been different enough to make it having happened in a familiar form into unlikely.

          • @Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            The US arms shipments to Britain, and later after the gun runner ship Lustiana, hoping to use its civilian passengers as a shield in breach of the rules of war, led to American popular support for joining with the Allies, which they eventually did to push Germany to defeat despite the newly Sovietised Russia withdrawing.

            And it might be that Dixieland and Yankeeland would support the Allies and Axis, and WWI would have had an American theatre, too opening in 1915 or so. And any major war fought in North America in the 20th century would totally alter the form US neo imperial power and hegemony took, if any at all, in the latter part of the 20th century.

            As a minimum, a different US would alter how Versaille and Balfour treaties were made and what who agreed to.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Did you forget about the part where the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor? You couldn’t have kept the US out of World War 2 with a trillion dollar payoff. The country wanted blood.

      • @RippleEffect@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 months ago

        You say this but it’s hardly just the south that voted for trump. As you mentioned, the butterfly effect could have changed things dramatically. Things still could have turned out worse for everyone.

        Though things are pretty crap now so I can definitely relate to your thought process.

      • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        If the south won, slavery would have died out naturally by the early 1900s (assuming confederate america lasted that long)

        Do you have access to some alternate timeline or something? Where can I get this secret information that you have?

      • @Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        To be fair though, Texas seceded once already and within a year or two was begging to be taken back. They probably would have crumbled too.

      • @TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        What if this is karma for invading and taking half of Mexico? There weren’t slavers or shittier-that-usual people in the region before that.

        • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          I mean, if the united states is getting karma for invading and annexing other peoples land, SURELY you’d think there would have been some repercussions from Native Americans, right? Hell, even Canada arguably has some leeway to give us karma if that’s the case.

          And Hawaii.

          And technically Puerto Rico, and the Somoa Islands, and Guam.

          Even though Vietnam isn’t, nor has it ever been a US territory, they still know what it’s like to be invaded by us. We were never trying to take land for ourselves, but we WERE trying to take land for our cold war ally. We just failed is all. And yet…for everybody reading this from a country that ISN’T America, here’s the weird thing. In our schools, they teach vietnam in history as if WE WON. Which I assume the rest of the world easily see’s how absurd that is. Here in America? There are PLENTY of people who think we’ve never lost a war. There are people who defend the 2001-2020 invasion of multiple middle eastern countries as a war we won. Some of them think it was multiple wars in a short amount of time we won. Others think it was one continuous war that we won. But those people exist. I’ve met many of them.

          Now, with all that said, NOBODY calls them freedom fries. Nobody. Never even heard of a single person who calls them that. It was a 2 week thing on tv, and then everybody just shrugged and called it stupid. Which is exactly what I’m hoping this whole gulf of america/mexico thing is. Just political theater, and then it’s over because it’s stupid.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          You should read about the Spanish missions and their treatment of the native people on the west coast. But also the Mexicans weren’t innocent of things either. They were constantly having political violence and even voluntarily returned monarchies. (yes plural)

          • @TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            As. Mexican, I agree with you. The conquistadores weren’t people of the highest caliber, and while the catholic monks were better, their mission was evangelizing at any cost, even if it meant killing people who didn’t want to. Even prehispanic people could be brutal.

            The main difference between colonial Mexico and USA was that slavery wasn’t a thing here, because the evangelized became full-fledged catholics, having a saved soul and all. Something unthinkable for the slavers, who justified their acts because blacks “didn’t have souls”.

            Mexican creoles, the hacendados, found a loophole: Catholics could still be exploited by crushing, multigenerational debt. That’s why we had a century of turmoil after the revolution(s), right after the century of turmoil after our independence from Spain.

            Guess my point is: by the time USA invaded and forcefully took half our country, we didn’t have slavers (the hacendado’s loophole was gone), and definitely didn’t trade humans as things. Your south brought back evils that were gone at the time.

            • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Yeah that’s true. The American South was exceptionally evil. I don’t think we’ve ever properly processed that as a country.

      • @db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        You’ve convinced me. I hadn’t thought if it quite that way.

        (The previous comment was unedited at the time this was written, just in case)

      • @scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        How exactly would slavery have died out “naturally” in a union made up entirely of slave states who’d just fought and won a war to defend it? I get your point about letting the south stand in its own so it could fall, but you are too casually sweeping aside the issue of slavery. “Yeah yeah - that would pass naturally - now let me tell you my MAIN point….”

    • @rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      You are being way too optimistic. A lot of people will needlessly die, not only from violence but also disease, starvation, suicide and natural disasters.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Personally I think this resurgence is a highly specific cultural moment that is coming as religion dies off and the white population of America teeters toward minority status.

      Since the US birth rate began to decline (natural phenomenon that happens to all developed nations) its strong immigration has held it up. But that has had an accumulating demographic effect. White people lost their official hegemony a long time ago but now they are facing the prospect of losing their simple majority and it scares the living shit out of them. It’s not just because privilege sees equality as oppression. It’s also because they know that they have treated others incredibly badly, and deserve to be castigated should they lose power.

      That’s why this Trump admin is so ugly. It’s the death spasm of a dying culture. That’s why this Trump admin is hollow at the center: it’s backed by a group that has no future and can only harken back to the past. This is why this Trump admin is openly undemocratic: they no longer have the numbers to play the game.

      This too shall pass, but at great cost. The USA is the greatest political prize there has ever been and it won’t be let go of lightly.

  • Yerbouti
    link
    fedilink
    1324 months ago

    The funny things is americans were like “We need guns to protect ourselves from tyrants.” But of course, the ones with the guns are precisely the ones siding with tyranny.

      • Yerbouti
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They were still a democracy back then, now it’s an oligarchy.

          • Yerbouti
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            I mean, you’ll get to see the difference between a bad and discriminatory democracy and a pure dictatorship soon enough. If you think an economical crash will bring back progressivism, I wish you good luck but I think it’s really naive. At this point with the gafam siding with pedo-president, they just wait for automation and AI to get a little further before getting rid of half of the country. And since it’s the US, the other half of the country will take care of it for them. An economical crash would be the perfect setup for this. I’m not even american but for the first time of my life I’m considering getting a gun.

        • @Acamon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          That’s an interesting point, because in terms of wealth inequality and unbridled exploitative capitalism stuff was pretty fucking dreadful back then too. But I don’t think there was as much interest in the super rich taking control of the government, because the government didn’t do that much and had never really been a problem for the wealthy (apart from that time they tried to abolish slavery…)

          I’m normally a “folks need to work together, big problems need big solutions” European lefty, but seeing the horror of what a powerful central government can do when it’s in the hands of crazy dipshits… It certainly highlights the benefits of small governments and localised power. Maybe this will lead to growth of some forces of progress that aren’t the federal government? The question is whether after the inevitable crash and burn, the next government will be willing to introduce the actual constraints, checks and balances to not let this happen again?

    • @crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      284 months ago

      Those pricks had one fucking job and they absolutely blew it. Boot lickers all of them, it makes me sick.

        • Psychadelligoat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          The chuds have more guns, thanks to many years of lefties demanding guns be removed from society and giving theirs up while the chuds just bought more (thanks for that one, Dad and friends)

          They’re also usually a liiiitle more ready to use them, and the law is a looooot more ready to defend them than they are us

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Being a shitty person is multidisciplinary, apparently.

    • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 months ago

      ‘Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary’

      -Karl Marx

  • @wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1014 months ago

    2nd amendment Americans. Shoot your fascist orange government rapist leader right between his beady little eyes.

    Trumps time has come.

    • Arghblarg
      link
      fedilink
      50
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “He who saves his country does not violate any law.” -Donald Trump (reading a post-it note handed to him by Felon Musk, quoting Napoleon, or something)

    • FarraigePlaisteaċ
      link
      fedilink
      344 months ago

      He’s old and doesn’t have much time left. The really problematic people are all around him and they are many.

    • @Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      264 months ago

      Shoot the dictator and prevent the war? But the dictator is merely the tip of the whole festering boil of social pus from which dictators emerge; shoot one, and there’ll be another one along in a minute. Shoot him too? Why not shoot everyone and invade Poland? In fifty years’, thirty years’, ten years’ time the world will be very nearly back on its old course. History always has a great weight of inertia.

      -Terry Pratchett (Lords and Ladies)

      Been thinking about this quote a lot lately. The fact that Trump is so popular shows that he’s just the symptom of a deeper, possibly terminal disease.

      • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        The fact that Trump is so popular shows that he’s just the symptom of a deeper, possibly terminal disease.

        Capitalism

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        This is the thing making me lean more toward leaving than trying to change things. Even if Trump were magically impeached today, and our election system were left as near-intact as it is, somebody just like him could be just as likely to be elected in the next cycle. And odds are he’s going to pull off rigging the system to make sure that happens by then.

        I think that on a long term scale, to get at the root, something needs to be done about the media machine behind him. Culture eats policy for breakfast.

    • @dontkickducks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Trump is just the convenient caricature of a puppet pushed forward to be the face and disorganise everything. When he dies he’ll be replaced by someone else capable of filling that role. It wouldn’t surprise me if the follow-up person is already known in their circles.

      Trump is old and messed up. The propaganda rocketing him up can just as easily shoot him down. He is here to do damage and to disrupt and corrupt the system. He’s here to weed out the failsafes against fascism/monarchy so a new political model can take over.

      When he’s done enough, someone else will step forward to rebuild and ‘repair the damage’ but only in such a way that the fascist/oligarchy gains more power and the majority of people lose more power.

    • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Not that I’m opposed to the idea on principle, but realistically that kind of long wolf adventurism would only make things worse.

  • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    544 months ago

    The silver lining here is that with now 8 years of abolishing civil/workers rights, technology and social development being suppressed and Americans falling so objectively behind in most measurable fields, hopefully Americans can get over their blatantly false sense of exceptionalism and become comfortable just being another part of the world.

    • @Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      454 months ago

      Exceptionalism and nationalism has more to do with the propaganda people are being fed, and less with the actual reality they are living. It will take more than a hard downturn in quality-of-life I think.

      • @Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        174 months ago

        Yeah. I think that Russians feel the same inside of their country, because they’re been fed with propaganda.

    • @Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      Yea. I’m sure they will be humbled like the people of North Korea, who think their supernatural leader invented hamburgers and the electric guitar.

      • @Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        North Koreans don’t think this. Everybody knows its bullshit. The point is not for people to believe in the bullshit, the point is normalizing the government to get away with obvious bullshit. And this pattern is not exclusive to North Korea at all.

    • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      314 months ago

      The fuck is protesting going to do at this point, lets be real here. Why do you think a protest has any sway of the bulldozer that is happening in the US Legal system?

      Protesting is just not gonna accomplish much, a little bit more than that is needed I think.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        214 months ago

        Such bull pucks! History shows 3% of population protests work.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          224 months ago

          Just to make it clear, though: The kind of protesting that works is not standing in the road and blocking traffic on a weekend. We’re talking indefinitely long protests where you occupy public places in a massive show of force meant to force the present regime to back down, and all the violent clashes and multi-day standoffs that come with that. This is (part of) why the civil rights movement worked but the Iraq war protests didn’t. For a recent example of this in action look up the Ukrainian Revolution or the Tunisian Revolution, or for an American example the civil rights movement. If the person you’re responding to had in mind more typical quiet single-day protests then they’re 100% correct, otherwise you’re right but it’s very much uncertain whether Americans have the guts for this kind of stunt.

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Americans are the most domesticated and propagandized culture on the planet. I gave up on the ideal of mass consciousness after Occupy, because the billionaires who own this country have spent generations dumbing it down to the point that almost nobody cares. We’re not seeing mass protests of the kind you describe untill things get very bad for a lot of people.

            • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              74 months ago

              Occupy was infiltrated by our government by people meant to destroy it from the inside. They incited people and then arrested them for it. This isn’t something that simply died off, they’ve mastered being able to co-opt an idea, push it the way they want, propagandize FUD around it, and then make it disappear.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        That just means your target changes. You’re not protesting to change an unchangeable administration. Instead you’re building consensus and creating a movement that can activate if certain lines are crossed.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    In the short term, yes.

    If trump remains in office after this term, absolutely yes.

    If we get a different admin - not just another republicrat trump clone - they’re going to have to spend an inordinate amount of time fixing all of trump’s fuckups. One of which should be restricting any wannabe monarch’s ability to rule by decree in the US. So yeah, we’re fucked, and we’re gonna have to spend a lot of effort getting unfucked, digging ourselves out of an oligarchy hole, instead of moving forward from a continually advancing starting point.

    E: allies are already turning away from us, politically and economically. They’ll form new alliances and relationships that the US doesn’t get to be a part of, or at least won’t get a leading position in. Same with things like soft power from international aid. China will step in, maybe the EU or even Russia. We lose the goodwill, stability, and any economic “ins” we could have achieved with that soft power. We’re fucked in lots of ways.

    • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      274 months ago

      We lose the goodwill

      Gone. It’s gone. I’m your neighbor. There’s no more goodwill. It’s been completely replaced with desire to see your hubris teach a collective lesson, and a process of internal reflection on how we can not end up like you.

      • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        104 months ago

        Hope you effectively learn that lesson. I don’t blame any country for turning away from the US. Stupid people electing destructive narcissists and doing absolutely nothing to prevent it.

      • @Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        My country looked up to the US as a charismatic winner with a big ego and an anger problem, who turned full coked up psychopath now. I listened to the Fall of Civilizations-Podcast a lot and this feels like one. It’s scary to watch and I feel sorry for all the good people living in this mess. But I agree, there is no sympathy left. Let the raging insanity humble the evil empire.

    • @superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      During my lifetime, the view people have of the US has completely changed.
      It used to be “When I grow up, I want to move there.” and “Oh, you went to the US on vacation? AWESOME”.
      Now it’s “Why the fuck would you go there, are you stupid?”

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Yeah no, this will be long term

      First trump term, him fucking over all allies is something the allies could forgive. Second time, not so much. Allies now know they can’t rely on the US to be a trustworthy ally.

      Trump already destroyed all soft power, he wants to reduce military spending by 50% too, so hard power will be down the drain as well.

      Then he’s destroying the economy, he increased highcorruption like there is no tomorrow, he is destroying education and he is destroying all oversight on companies

      He’s working hard on destroying democratic institutions too so forget fair elections, as if the US ever had any.

      IMHO, the US will never recover from trump, and that is what it deserves. It always had the great chance to be truely great but it fucked itself around every corner trying to please the rich

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not even close to being done. Right now the biggest changes are a reduction in non law enforcement/immigration government staff and contracts being paid out. The biggest thing coming down the pipeline is Trump clearly wants to free himself of the courts and congress. But it’s far too early to say he’s won that. And even that wouldn’t be the end of things. In the US the states have a lot of autonomy. They are actually the ones responsible for holding elections. So let’s look at a worst case scenario, where he tries to say we shouldn’t have elections.

    The first thing that’s going to happen is all the blue states are going to tell him to fuck off and hold them anyways. The second thing that’s going to happen is some red states will also do so, although they’ll likely be less coarse with the language. Then a few more red states will be pressured into having elections by massive protests of people angry they can’t vote anymore. Then while Trump is having a fit because there’s no real way for him to stop this process, we get to learn about a fun feature of the US Congress. There is no law requiring it to meet in D.C. Trump would likely try to claim whatever is left over is the real congress, but without having been elected the Constitution is clear that those states forfeit representation until they hold an election.

    So we’d be left with a House that is majority anti-Trump, after all, he tried to make them irrelevant at best. In the Senate we’d likely be looking at something of an even split in 2026. There’s probably 5-7ish red states that would hold elections anyways and combined with the blue states and senate democrats leaving DC they would be able to convene elsewhere with a majority to declare rules of the Senate without Trump’s interference. The new Congress would likely swiftly vote to impeach Trump. The remnants of the old one would protest this but they don’t have any legal power. Only the backing of Trump and propaganda power.

    This leaves Vance with a choice. This would be by design because our democratic party leaders only appear to be stupid when convenient. Vance can throw his weight behind Trump and get impeached himself or he can order Trump removed from the White House thus acknowledging the primacy of Congress. If he chooses the first option then Congress simply repeats the process and the presidency goes to the next person in line, the speaker of the house. Yes, Congress can effectively vote one of it’s own members into the White House at any time. This president then declares an emergency and orders the military to secure DC. The military loves process, and loves the Constitution. It is highly likely this order would be followed.

    However all would not be well, it’s not a fairy tale. It would likely be the start of an American Insurgency that would take decades to root out. It would certainly be the end of the US as the hegemonic world power. Our Aircraft Carriers would rust in port and our projection of soft and hard power over the world would wither. But we would still be here, just much diminished and never the same in our lifetimes. This is certainly scary but if we all do our part this is as close as we would come to losing our democracy. Far more insidious is the threat of slowly revoking the right to vote. They’d start by raising the age, then by requiring you to not have any debt of specific kinds, then by making harsh punishments for illegally voting, and other such things until voting is effectively restricted to land owners. Certain factions would like to get it to white christian male landowners but that’s probably a decade or more down that line if at all.

    Notes -

    Why wouldn’t he just send in the military?

    2028 isn’t enough time to purge and train enough people to make the military loyal to him. He would be mid project on that at best and the states could effectively counter him into a stand still with their national guard. This would make many people stay home, but the determined voters are likely to be anti-trump because that’s the change incentive. Loyalists will feel like the elections don’t matter.

    What’s stopping SCOTUS from declaring the elections invalid?

    The states. SCOTUS is only relevant as long as they have reputation of being an impartial arbiter of Constitutional Law. That opinion is already in the trash heap. They could not make such a decision today, or after 4 more years unless they spend the next 4 years setting themselves as at least a mild opposition in a long game. But they haven’t shown that kind of patience.

    What happens in Trump surrounds himself with thousands of armed loyalists in DC?

    We select a new capital and wish him the best of luck dealing with DC. There is no law requiring DC be the Capital. The Constitution doesn’t even require the states to give up a district, it only provides the legal possibility. There’s no need to engage in that kind of a conflict. Such a group would be arrested bit by bit by Maryland, Virginia, and Federal authorities until it could be resolved swiftly.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        164 months ago

        I’m probably not smarter than you, this is just in my field of study. And to throw a little water on it, it depends on people doing things. We can all sit on our couch and watch the ministry of newspeak broadcasts or we can be in the streets. Our leaders are humans and we can’t expect them to act in a way that endangers themselves without visible support. But it actually takes a heck of a lot to kill a country. We aren’t anywhere near that point yet. Get mad, get in the streets.

    • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      The flaw with this scenario is that it assumes Trump would try to simply cancel the elections. Instead, he would be more likely to regulate them in a way that makes unseating him impossible. For example, federal regulations might be implemented that required states to use voting machines, voting machines that are produced by corrupted companies. He just straight up steals the election through rigged voting machines. Or they mess with registrations and voter purges to a level more than the amount that already got Trump elected this time. See the SAVE Act..

      Or alternatively, the election systems themselves will be unaffected. However, the candidates will be carefully managed. Any Democratic candidate that would present a significant threat to MAGA will be arrested on trumped-up charges. The courts will miraculously cease to give the Democratic candidate the same leeway they did to Trump when they “didn’t want to interfere with the election.” Or he’ll manipulate the Democratic elites so much that they end up electing someone even more conservative. They end up running Ted Cruz or something insane like that.

      Remember, even the citizens of the Soviet Union got to have elections.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        He can certainly try, but he can’t pass laws about elections without Congress, which brings the filibuster into play.

        Arresting the party leaders of the opposition also generally doesn’t work if you do it more than once or the situation is already very politicized.

        At the end of the day it’s going to require us to be in the streets no matter what he tries. Our state leaders need to see that they have support to stand up to Trump.

        • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          The problem that I keep seeing here is people saying “well, he can’t do that.”

          Stop that. He can do it because nobody’s going to stop him. I mean, you surely don’t expect that little shit Mike Johnson to tell Daddy Trump no. The constitution itself isn’t going to rise up out of its case like Godzilla and crush him. The judiciary isn’t going to come and enforce their decision in person. That just leaves the military. They’re either going to coup him, or not, and I’m expecting the latter case.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            That’s not what I’m saying. The entire point here is that he does not have the physical power to interfere in state elections without an act of Congress. The states would arrest any federal agents trying to do so. This isn’t a “gentleman’s agreement” that nobody is enforcing.

    • Coil
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      I really only lurk on Lemmy, but I felt the need to comment. Thank you for writing this. I’ve been stressed out since the EO was announced. I felt like we were doomed, but this gives me some hope. Even if this doesn’t happen, I feel better knowing there is still a way to possibly course correct.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        This is actually one of the more pessimistic courses. It’s probable that Trump gets enough push back that his legacy consists of massively handicapping the civil service, screwing up the economy and our alliances, and then peacefully transferring power to a democratic party president.

        One of the other things we need to do is seriously organize to support a more left candidate in the 2028 primaries. Part of this shock and awe is meant to make us give up, not only resisting Trump but also in organizing within the Democratic party.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Yeah, there’s still quite a few good paths here. I can’t guarantee we do what’s needed but I can show how if we demand it from our leaders and publicly support them it becomes really hard for Trump and friends to reach their goals.

  • Swordgeek
    link
    fedilink
    334 months ago

    Yes.

    The amount of harm already done to your country by Trump and Musk is immeasurable, and will take a generation or more to recover from.

    The amount of harm done to your standing in the world is equally bad. The world was skeptical after Trump’s first term fucked over the rest of the world, but we were hopeful that maybe the US had learned their lesson?

    Nope. They elected a fascist. They RE-elected a known fascist, felon, rapist, idiot-child, psychopath. Worse, they bolstered Musk to get into a seat of unauthorized and unimaginable power.

    When Trump announced his idiotic tarrifs, Canada collectively said “that’s it - we’re divorcing.” When he pulled back on the idea for 30 days, Canada said “don’t care, still divorcing.”

    Trump is following the exact model of HItler, and it’s only a matter of time until he actually invades either Greenland or Canada if he’s not stopped. The USA has to collapse into ruin and rebuild from scratch before anyone is going to trust them again.

  • CurlyWurlies4All
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 months ago

    Going from decline to fall. To be fair it took Rome 200 years or so I’m sure the US will limp on for a while yet. But it won’t ever be what it was again.

    • @Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      214 months ago

      The “limping on” has been the past 40 years already. Ever since Neoliberalism became the dominant economic ideology and fully embraced by both mayor parties.

      Capitalism declines into Fascism. The current administration is not the root cause of the US problems. It is a symptom that is accelerating the decline into Fascism. But the ground work was laid many years ago and defended ever since. We see a similar trend in many other countries that adopted the US Neoliberalism to various extends.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    Intensionally, the USA is going to lose its status as a hyperpower. Europe is going to decouple from American defense policy to the point where I can see American military bases close in Europe. An anti-Chinese military alliance will function with or without the USA anchored by India and Japan, but I see that force yielding some territory to China in the near term. There will probably be an increase in the number of wars in general as regions go into conflict without an American threat to maintain borders. Nothing the USA does is likely going to fix this.

    Domestically, the administration is the greatest threat to the republic since the Civil War. If Trump is able to be pushed out in the future, there is going to need to be a major re-evaluation of how the American federal government works. This is going to require constitutional changes and the removal of major powers that the President has collected as the federal government grew.

    • @VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      American here. Maybe I’m going through the five stages of grief and now I’m at acceptance.

      Everything in your first paragraph sounds accurate and maybe something that probably needed to happen. America as the World Police is/has been a problem. There were some positives, but a lot of negatives.

      The sooner America gets off the stage, the better. We don’t deserve the recognition. We can’t even feed our own people and yet wield tremendous influence internationally, and maybe it’s a positive thing that it ends soon.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        My only concern is that I expect an increase in international conflict as the American security guarantee is gone. The only remaining countries capable of projecting power internationally can’t do it on nearly the scale of the USA. I expect a lot of wars until new spheres of influence get established.

    • @PanArab@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      China is focusing on itself, maybe that’s what the US and Europe should do for a while.

  • @EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yes.

    In the short term not much will change and no one will react. By the time they want to react, they’ll play into a fascist crackdown.

    Look into the Business Plot. This is basically the result of a century of planning between business interests and religious fanatics with too much money.

    As long as capitalism is propagandized as a good thing, civilization will continue to face this issue of the few exploiting the many.

    Do you believe every human deserves the same rights and dignities? It’s not possible to make a cell phone without relying on slave labor in the supply chains.

    Profit is unpaid labor. As long as we normalize giving at the profits to those that already have everything, civilisations will continue to implode until one makes a mistake of such hubris everyone dies. Look at PFAS. One day we will unleash something we can’t contain and we’ll be dead before we can detect it or treat it.

    Our species simply will not survive because we’re too eager to shit where we sleep just so we don’t have to walk all the way to the bathroom.

  • Wren
    link
    fedilink
    234 months ago

    Short answer? Yes. Long answer? Absolutely.

    • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      To be fair, decades to destroy. This has been slowly culminating since before I was even born. Maybe before my parents were born.