• /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    624 days ago

    Told my republican dad that Trump is gonna cut the USPS. He was basically like “no way jose, there’s no way he will do that”

    • @sierramccharlie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      524 days ago

      It feels like the only silver lining to all of this bullshit is the amount of I Told You So’s that are piling up on the table.

    • @Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      325 days ago

      It can be systematically deconstructed and defunded until it no longer works and is non-functional and frustrating to use and then that used as an excuse to eliminate it.

    • @GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      325 days ago

      You’re right about it not going anywhere, but its because Amazon uses USPS as a subcontractor to deliver packages that they can’t deliver reliably. Not because any of the current administration give a shit about the Constitution or what it has to say about the USPS.

    • I think the states would have to agree to it first, wouldn’t they? Congress can’t unilaterally modify the Constitution (thank Christ).

      • @Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        125 days ago

        I think there needs to be a senate & congress vote AND a majority of states need to ratify the amendment after which the Supreme court does a review.

        Elon Musk and Donald Trump are so out of touch with the basic American citizen today that I’m sure they think the Postal Service is the organization that puts up road signs and highway barriers or something

        • @AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          225 days ago

          I think there needs to be a senate & congress vote AND a majority of states need to ratify the amendment after which the Supreme court does a review.

          I’m not sure a Supreme Court review is an official part of the process—the SC can review the constitutionality of ordinary laws, but amendments are constitutional by definition.

          • @Placebonickname@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            025 days ago

            Wouldn’t the Supreme Court need to review to make sure 1 new amendment doesn’t include wording that conflicts with other amendments thought? Just asking, not sure about any of these, in fact I cannot even remember any amendment ratified after the Women’s right to vote in the 1920s.

            • @bluemellophone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              125 days ago

              No, by definition a Constitutional Amendment would be part of the Constitution. All branches of government derive their authority from the Constitution. Simply put, the Constitution is above SCOTUS.

              The Supreme Court can intercede if the process for ratification is not followed, but as long as the agreed upon process is followed there is literally nothing a judge could do.

      • @jimjam5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        I feel like plebs who like the idea of privatizing the USPS (for the sake of “saving money” and therefore not having to pay for a service they “don’t need”) are the same folk who by definition of supporting the orange turd also like the idea of raising taxes for themselves and the majority of the US population to then give to the rich (but of course if they’re in the tax bracket where they make so much to get the tax break then fuck them).

        It’s fine if they want to flaunt their brand of crazy but at least make it make sense.