The older Republicans included guys Theodore Roosevelt or Eisenhower, the ones who wanted a small government that leaves you alone. They seem to have died off after Regan.

He wants to machine gun Americans

Boston Massacre 2.0?

The Confederacy was in a state of rebellion too. He’s equated standing up to ICE, which is seemingly similar to when the Bostonians stood up to and were massacred by the British, with the Confederate’s bombing of Ft. Sumter.

Well you see, the thing about conservatives is that they are fucking stupid self-serving liars evil.

Fixed it for you. Some of the old school Republicans are that, true. But, this new Republican party adopted their sinister mindset because “god said so”. While a few of them are motivated by greed, this shit-fest is motivated by legitimate belief. Incidentally, this is the same minset that motivated the crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the Salem witch trials, 9/11, and ISIS. Its a fundamentalist mindset where they can jusify evil in god’s name.

This bitch knows damn well America isn’t a “Christian nation,”

Maybe, or maybe she actually believes the lie. Or, maybe, she thinks it her mission to turn the United States into the holy land (ISIS thought the same thing about the middle east, and probably the world).

she’ll shout it from the rooftops if she thinks she can get away with it in order to advance her hateful, bigoted agenda.

Yep. She’s a true believer.

I think that’s a complicated question. It’s both yes and no. Yes, we should nationalize them. No, nationalizing them should not be by tRump. That sets the precedent, or at least reinforces, the concept that the architecture of industry can be nationalized as payback for petty political squabbling. They should be nationalized, however, because fElon has proven himself to be unstable, reckless, petty, and a risk to the nation.

So you admit you’re just preaching hate? Because youre the real fascist?

Rage is not the same thing as hate. Where rage is an intense feeling of passion, hate is an extreme dislike or disgust. They are synonymous, but they are not the same. Rage would have been what they French expressed against King Louis the XVI and the first two estates, hate is what the Nazis expressed against the Jews and the other undesirables.

Fascism is just revolutionary conservatism. You’re really not helping your case here.

Fascism need not even be brought in via a coup. While Mussolini took over from a coup, Hitler was elected. They were revolutionary mindsets in that they were so diametrically opposed to the established reigns of power, but conservatism is not necessarily the direction revolution must follow. Take for example the French revolution or compare the Mensheviks with the Bolsheviks. Both those revolutions had a leftist slant. Hell even the American Revolution was a leftist position compared to the British parliament’s conservatism that was undertaken in during its empire.

Also opposing evil is action, and action is fascist.

Really? Tell that to MLK, Rosa Parks, or the march across the bridge to Montgomery. Tell that to the allies as they fought against actual Nazis.

if the dems are ever not doing something you want them to, it is entirely and personally your fault.

It’s my fault in that I am not rich like the big donors who bought our political system? I’m sorry that I do not have a million dollars to throw around.

Furthermore, action for the sake of action is literally one of umberto eco’s main identifiers for fascism, so asking the dems to do literally anything makes you the real fascist.

Maybe, but it can also be the grounds for revolution rather than fascism. But even if this point is correct, I ask: is better to go quietly into the extermination camps they’re setting up? Or should you ardently resist, struggle, and force them to drag you into the camp? I quote Dylan Thomas to make my point:

Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

I polled four trans women and one trans man. All the trans women said if the zyklon b had to be adninistered orally

Polling people over Zyklon B and its application is absurd. It shows that you either asked a foolish question or the recipients did not comprehend Zyklon B. Zyklon B was the cyanide-based pesticide gas used by the Nazis at Auschwitz-Birkenau, Majdanek, and other extermination camps. My point is that we’re dealing with Nazis resurgent, and the Dem’s tacos are a so limited in their messaging/resistence that its absurd. Evil is winning, and tacos are not how you oppose evil.

Maybe dont speak ror marginalized people without their consent, asshole

You don’t know me. You don’t know what communities I am and am not apart of. Furthermore, it is bold of you to assume I was speaking for anybody but myself. I was merely stating my position that tacos are a poultry pittance of a resistance against the evil that is the Republican party.

Would you rather they not give out tacos? Fascist.

I’d rather something more substantial than one stunt of tacos. Like, give tacos to Americans in the Republicans home districts.

Maybe you should think about how you can best support the democratic party, instead of failing them by asking them to do literally anything?

I vote for them. I donate to the ACLU, the HRC, and the Trevor Project. I am a layperson who is not needed by the political machine more than every other year. I am working on passing the bar exam, so I can’t quite litigate yet. But, I will be in a position in a bit. So, do you have any suggestions?

My point that I made here:

are trying to exterminate the T in LGBT

was that evil must be opposed beyond mere tacos one time in one location as an obvious political stunt. Ask a T if these tacos would make the Zyklon B go down any easier.

Fair. Not a fan of Reddit anymore, so having an alternative is important.

That’s good.

Is lemmy.world the same thing as lemm.ee?

Can’t wait to see how these 40 TB hard drives, a wonderment of technology, will be used to further shove AI down my throat.

That goes against the political machinations of their donors.

They’re planning to take away food stamps, end health insurance for the needy, and are trying to exterminate the T in LGBT (don’t worry, they’ll come for the LGBs too since its last hired, first fired). But, the best Dems can do is giving out tacos once as a political ploy?

Democratic voters would like to sign on to that.

Not everywhere has easy access to elevation or water. See, e.g., desert states, which are flat and dry

Working as intended

-Republicans after being bought out by big oil and gas.

There’s two types of camping: (1) outdoor camping, which is the shitty one ; and (2) indoor, which has pillow forts.

Excuse me, sir. There is no town in Mississippi called “Bumfuck”. That town is firmly within the boundaries of Iowa.

Mississippi would never stoop to the level of Iowa in having Bumfuck, Iowa. Mississippi is more elegant in its nomenclature. Thus, if you wish to make a point about a town in the middle of nowhere in Mississippi, please respect Mississippi by referring to such a town as Cousin-Hump, Mississippi. Thank you.