It already includes the West Bank and a chunk of Syria.

Man this is Reddit levels of bait at least make it believable

Yes, Israel obviously is and always has been the aggressor in this conflict. They are also the much more evil side. Doesn’t mean Hamas is incapable of also committing war crimes

They’re not dying for nothing. The state of Israel in its current form will not survive this war.

You’re not supposed to feel bad she was an influencer, whatever that means. You’re supposed to feel bad that 11-year-old children are being intentionally targeted by airstrikes.

Not even a little? I recognise that many of their actions are clearly immoral or inhumane but I’m not self righteous enough to know I wouldn’t do the same if everyone I know was murdered, tortured, raped and starved by Israel.

The law of war governs conduct during armed conflict, regardless of whether or not a formal declaration of war exists or how disproportionate said conflict is

Some things require more than just the perceived wishes of a single madman, or the world as we know it would have already been destroyed several times over.

You are, objectively, not your mind. The brain is just another organ that specifically evolved to better help your “bone prison” survive. That it sometimes comes with unpleasant side-effects like existential dread is a trade-off that was deemed acceptable thousands of years before you came to existence and one which you have entirely no control over.

You think the US is going to attack Canada? Like, with military force? Are you delusional?

Ah yes, the two choices: drinking beer from a shoe or committing genocide.

Why does random lemmy user care what you came here for?

Hey Goosebumps are great

Fair

This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.

I enjoy the social aspect of running. Parkruns, Strava, meeting friends and getting coffee after etc.

This is not the legal definition of civilian.

He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who deserved to be murdered but that does not change the definition

? Who said he was innocent

Clearly everyone here is illiterate lol