"One coder added at least two database entries that are visible on the live site and say “this is a joke of a .gov site” and “THESE ‘EXPERTS’ LEFT THEIR DATABASE OPEN -roro.” "
"One coder added at least two database entries that are visible on the live site and say “this is a joke of a .gov site” and “THESE ‘EXPERTS’ LEFT THEIR DATABASE OPEN -roro.” "
Compared with an SQL injection, how sophisticated is this method?
If SQL injection is picking a lock, this is entering through an unlocked door.
Not sophisticated at all, authentication on API routes is way earlier on the security checklist than SQL query sanitisation. This site is amateur work.
Not to worry, they don’t use SQL
Much much simpler, with a SQL injection at least you have to bypass the filters set, this is just submitting the changes through an API and the DB just eats it up.