• Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -415 days ago

        Or it’s just a perfectly normal thing that billions of people do every day?

        • MynameisAllen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 days ago

          Except that signal is blocked by many companies Mobile Device Management. The one that don’t can typically see who has the app installed. This provides a new clever way to maybe whistleblow

              • @Broken@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                012 days ago

                Not “you” necessarily, “one”.

                I bring it up because you mentioned company MDM blocking signal. The fact that company MDM is active indicates its a company device (if it’s not that’s an entirely different conversation).

                So why would one expect privacy on a device they don’t own?

                • MynameisAllen
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  012 days ago

                  Well more I’m pointing to the idea that you may be trying to whistleblow on said company and this may provide a more succinct way to do so

                  • @Broken@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 days ago

                    I get that, but it’s more logical to me that of I’m going to whistleblow on a company to not use one of their devices to do it. That way it doesn’t matter what apps are or are not secure, you’re not using their device that can potentially track you.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 days ago

        Then you’re a terrorist if you use the internet, period

        Nearly all internet traffic if encrypted, and for plain browser traffic it’s probably in the 95+%

        You access your bank? Terrorist! Email? Terrorist! Lemmy? Terrorist!

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        015 days ago

        Then you’re also a terrorist if you use The Guardian 🤷‍♂️

        • @Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I dont’ know, do you have sources about this ? Or are you imagining thing and deciding it is true ?

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            015 days ago

            Sources for what, exactly? What is “fantasming”? The title of the article you posted is “Criminalization of encryption”. The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It’s all encrypted.

            • @Diurnambule@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              So you read the title and you know everything. There is a liste of what they are accusing and their is no mention of internet

              The elements of the investigation that have been communicated to us are staggering. Here are just some of the practices that are being misused as evidence of terrorist behavior6:

              – the use of applications such as Signal, WhatsApp, Wire, Silence or ProtonMail to encrypt communications ;

              – using Internet privacy tools such as VPN, Tor or Tails7 ;

              – protecting ourselves against the exploitation of our personal data by GAFAM via services such as /e/OS, LineageOS, F-Droid ;

              – encrypting digital media;

              – organizing and participating in digital hygiene training sessions;

              – simple possession of technical documentation.

              But continue to invent reality. What are fact if not debatable point of view ? That the end for me. Have a great day.