• @cendawanita
    link
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Certainly, anyone should continue to question the political strategy of any of these choices. I’m still not dismissing the scientific results since I can see wellbeing in my society benefiting from it. I wouldn’t want to use these gains to excuse injustice but I have as little interest in using the injustices as rhetorical cudgel because as I said above, the administrative attention still won’t be funnelled there even if removed. In the meantime the genie (access to tech and learning) is now out. Will there be a significant reallocation on the govt side? I doubt it and history bears it out. So how to resolve the tension? A foolish person would be the kind to be convinced it can be resolved in an afternoon in favour of one or the other.

    Even to use the occupation of land as an example, you can of course then claim the political ideology of the natives suspect but at the same time a lot of advocacy is wanting to be part of the process as part of the reparations rather than completely kicking them out.

    • @cendawanita
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And without getting into the rights of theoretical lifeforms on asteroids, the fact that deep space mining might just be possible and might just reduce pressure on many countries such as in Africa which are in turmoil due to this industry as well as as mining for space water, this is all things to be discounted? Let’s just be mad because my room (earth) isn’t clean. I can’t possibly do anything else?