• To add to this, A lot of gorillas that are saved from unsafe/illegal conditions cannot go back into the wild. Places like The Rotterdam zoo provides a lot of enrichment for these animals that you won’t see at say, Joe’s roadside animal park.

    • @rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Why not save animals from unsafe/illegal conditions and provide enrichment, without turning the animals into an attraction?

      • Liz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

        • @rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -61 year ago

          Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

          But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

          • Liz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

              • Liz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Not in a binary sense, no. Such thinking isn’t useful, however. Zoos are a very strong net good fot animals, with minimal downsides (assuming the zoo keepers aren’t calloused assholes).

          • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.

      • @wahming
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Because people wouldn’t support spending their taxes on it without making them aware of the value. Which is done by educating them.