• @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      729 hours ago

      It’s like reverse stack ranking. They’ll be left with the people that couldn’t find another job.

    • @Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 hours ago

      Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

      So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

        • @Jrockwar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 minutes ago

          Yes, but they’re making people quit instead. They don’t need to pay severance to employees who quit because of RTO.

        • @Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          215 minutes ago

          They are getting severance when terminated, unless for cause. My comment was, this is how they avoid it by forcing people to quit.

      • @foofy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 hours ago

        No rank and file US-based employees at Amazon are getting years of severance. They don’t do that.

        • @Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 minutes ago

          Yeah, that was a typo and my experience is limited towards the AWS side which is also facing this issue. But the numbers are there, some people have been at Amazon for a decade, so 20 months (if they had MY package of 2mos per year). Amazon was throwing everything at new hires, because they were making bank on their work.

    • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3510 hours ago

      Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -36 hours ago

      If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 hours ago

        You don’t have to fund severance if people leave on their own.

      • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 hours ago

        I am pretty sure working from home has proven to be more productive, so I think other factors are at play here. I worry that returning to the office might be the only way to keep the capitalists from trying to send our jobs over to poorer nations. If the tapeworms think the job needs to be done face to face then it is much hardet to send those jobs to India or S. America.

        • @WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          43 minutes ago

          They’ve already tried to send all the jobs they can to India or South America. It ultimately didn’t work. They can send some, but the language and cultural barriers, plus the difficulty of assessing quality candidates just doesn’t make it viable at scale. They’ve already tried that game and it failed. Everything that can be outsourced to India already has been outsourced to India.

      • @zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 hours ago

        So they don’t have to pay severance or other state penalties for doing an actual layoff. They aren’t thinking of talent with this move.