• @scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -36 hours ago

    If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 hours ago

      You don’t have to fund severance if people leave on their own.

    • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 hours ago

      I am pretty sure working from home has proven to be more productive, so I think other factors are at play here. I worry that returning to the office might be the only way to keep the capitalists from trying to send our jobs over to poorer nations. If the tapeworms think the job needs to be done face to face then it is much hardet to send those jobs to India or S. America.

      • @WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        37 minutes ago

        They’ve already tried to send all the jobs they can to India or South America. It ultimately didn’t work. They can send some, but the language and cultural barriers, plus the difficulty of assessing quality candidates just doesn’t make it viable at scale. They’ve already tried that game and it failed. Everything that can be outsourced to India already has been outsourced to India.

    • @zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 hours ago

      So they don’t have to pay severance or other state penalties for doing an actual layoff. They aren’t thinking of talent with this move.