• andrew_bidlaw
    link
    fedilink
    1811 months ago

    The final death toll from the attack is now thought to be 695 Israeli civilians, including 36 children, as well as 373 security forces and 71 foreigners, giving a total of 1,139.

    So? Does it matter if it was 1400, 1300 or 1139? It’s mass murder anyway, and Hamas are still bastards for killing them. And Netanyahu is still a bastard for using it as a free pass on bombing Gaza. These numbers don’t change anything at all.

    Can one imagine a rave party with a thousand+ of people, and then imagine them all dead? Or a european-like district with housing, schools, shops for 13k people - you can see them on Google Maps, they were pretty sweet in spite of israeli politics - all leveled down to the ground. It’s a rave party not unlike one happening near you, this neighborhood is not unlike yours. These people may not speak english, yet they share basic things with you, like, they could’ve liked the same songs, the same movies like you do, some of them could’ve even been trekkies. And now they are lost. They won’t have a child, they won’t share a funny story over drinks with friends, they won’t build that birdhouse their elderly parents asked for. They are dead, non-existent, and all work put into making them proper adults is lost. And whatever it’s a thousand, or a thousand of thosands, it’s too much to ignore. Every person shot or slayed there is too much to ignore. There should be a ceasefire agreement first, it needs to stop.

    • NoIWontPickaName
      link
      fedilink
      2811 months ago

      I know right, imagine if it had been over 15,000 innocent people that had had their homes destroyed and their family and friends killed over something they had nothing to do with.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      -16
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      and then imagine them all dead?

      Did that happen?

      Also while atrocities were committed on October 7th, AFAIK there was no mass murder. And if you’re wondering how so many people died then, there’s an unknown but significant number of IDF-inflicted casualties in those 1139.

      • @exception4289@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1911 months ago

        I’m not sure what’s the definition of mass murder but advancing in a city/place and start killing indiscriminately sounds a lot like it.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yes but I’m saying that didn’t happen to my knowledge. From what we know so far about the attack, the IDF response was far from careful not to harm civilians, and in some cases chose to actively kill hostages to get the Hamas soldiers who captured them.

          Israel so far hasn’t done anything close to releasing the number of people who died to IDF fire, or just in the crossfire between Hamas and the IDF, and until they do that they have no grounds to claim Hamas committed mass murder.

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -7
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          ~ 1/3 military kills is definitely not “indiscriminately killing”. These numbers change everything.

          It’s not a mass murder anymore. Oct7 was a justified targeted retaliation.

          • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            67% civilian casualties is a universally abhorrent figure, and shows a complete disregard for the value of innocent human lives.

            Also, mass murder is generally defined as the killing of 3 or more persons at a time. Not exactly a high bar.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              67% civilian casualties is a universally abhorrent figure

              Is it? I mean civilians getting killed is bad no matter the number, and I’m not denying Hamas soldiers committed war crimes, but for example in Iraq the US coalition’s percentage was 77%.

              • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Because everyone is so happy that Iraq happened? Here, fixed:

                77% civilian casualties is also a universally abhorrent figure

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  Yeah I’m not saying 67% civilians is a good number, only that it’s a normal number.

                  • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 months ago

                    Ah, I see what you’re saying now. Unfortunately yes, 67% it isn’t particularly out of the ordinary. Perhaps I’m in a bit of a bubble, but I think/hope the vast majority of people consider this historical “normal” to be “abhorrent” these days. Such would be a positive change for society.

                    Perhaps I should also clarify that by “universal”, I don’t mean “everyone agrees”, but rather “regardless of the circumstances”. I included this to suggest that I think the civilian casualty rate in Palestine is also abhorrent, and I don’t think the October 7 attacks justify it in the slightest.

            • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              My man you better not start reading about American civilian casualty figures. And ESPECIALLY not about israel ones.

              Also most israeli civilians are IDF reservists so they are in fact uncounted soldiers. The IDF just called up 300.000 “innocent civilians” to commit genocide in Gaza? lmao.

              The best number is how little children were killed in compared to the total amount of people.

              • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                My man you better not start reading about American civilian casualty figures. And ESPECIALLY not about israel ones.

                Let me guess, I would find more universally abhorrent figures? What exactly do you think “universally” means?

                Also most israeli civilians are IDF reservists

                Where the fuck did you get that from?

                  • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 months ago

                    I don’t follow your argument. So civilians that go through compulsory military service are not civilians? Korea, Vietnam, and Denmark have basically no civilian population? Or is it wartime conscription that you have a problem with? Is every American citizen an attack target because they theoretically could be conscripted as a response to the attack?

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            Justified retaliation, and an operation meant to get concessions out of Israel for Gazans. That’s why they took the hostages.

      • andrew_bidlaw
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        there was no mass murder

        Go fuck yourself with a fork if 1139, or even 500 isn’t a mass murder in your dictionary, I don’t feel like I want to talk to you. You don’t help palestinians by downplaying what hamas bastards did to jews while enjoying golf courses in Quatar.

        • @deft@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Fuck yourself first asshole they used this excuse to declare a genocide and it comes out Israeli leadership fucking funded Hamas and allowed this shit to happen.

          Hamas sucks but everything they did has Israeli hands helping and now Israeli hands are committing genocide.

          How fuckin stupid are you?

          • andrew_bidlaw
            link
            fedilink
            -311 months ago

            You’d go to excuse Hamas, won’t you?

            Hamas sucks but …

            Get. Lost. Already.

            • @deft@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              411 months ago

              Yes i absolutely will excuse Hamas. They’re a rabid angry abused dog taunted and then their owner secretly unlocked the fence and cried “what a bad dog look what it did to me!”

              Israel is the start and end of this Hamas is a pawn. Fuck off idiot.

              • andrew_bidlaw
                link
                fedilink
                611 months ago

                You are honest about that. I’d give you that. It feels refreshing to find an opponent who stays by their ideals. Thinking you are terminally wrong, I respect you still being there.

            • @masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -511 months ago

              Excuse Hamas for what?

              Launching an attack on a white supremacist settler-colonialist state that has been waging war on Palestinians since 1949?

              I think it is you that needs to get lost.

              • andrew_bidlaw
                link
                fedilink
                011 months ago

                Killing a thousand of people is ok, right?

                You know you can hate both Hamas and Israeli monsters?

                • @masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 months ago

                  Killing a thousand of people is ok, right?

                  Not keeping up with current events, are you?

                  Or are you just so desperate to cling to your pro-Israeli narrative that you will simply ignore them?

                  • andrew_bidlaw
                    link
                    fedilink
                    011 months ago

                    Do you suggest I’ve hallucinated all these killings done by Hamas? They did indeed happened. There are still hostages kept by them in Gaza.

                    IDF isn’t right using that as a reason to murder 10x more. Netanyahu should be roped on the closest tree branch if you’d ask me. But israelis doing these crimes don’t excuse Hamas’s attack. It is still a morbid act of terror that should be remembered and acted upon.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -211 months ago

          I literally responded to that in the very next sentence. Until the IDF counts the people their own fire killed, and the ones who died in the crossfire, both of which exist in significant numbers, we have no evidence Hamas did anything close to mass murder. Also that 1139 is counting the 373 security force people, which are legitimate military targets.

              • andrew_bidlaw
                link
                fedilink
                011 months ago

                No?

                You mean these 800-something people died in a cross-fire? I feel like I don’t uderstand you.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  The crossfire, reckless (sometimes deliberate when they were taken hostage) IDF fire and Hamas war crimes. These three categories all contain significant numbers of people, so until we know who killed how many and where there are no grounds to claim Hamas committed mass murder.