• @addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    263 months ago

    It’s in Unity, isn’t it? So rather than multiplying the speeds by Time.deltaTime when you’re doing frame updates, you just don’t do that. Easy peasy. They’ve got that real “Japanese game devs from twenty years ago” vibe going.

    • @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      Or even a decade ago. Dark Souls 2 had some enemies’ attack animations tied to frame rate, like the Alonne Knights. So they attacked incredibly fast on PC compared to console.

      Weapon degradation was also tied to framerate :(

      • Annoyed_🦀 A
        link
        English
        33 months ago

        Huh, now i know why that particular enemy are janky as heck in every aspect.

      • @xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Minecraft has this wonderful mechanism where everything is dependent on game-tick/server-tick, which is independent of player FPS. Why do modern developers keep using FPS for game physics?

        • @Baleine@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Minecraft is different because it uses a client and server pattern, separating the physics and display loops completely

        • breadguyyy
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          basically every game uses ticks lol this was not intentional

      • ms.lane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        They fixed that with 76, Both 76 and Starfield have physics untied from framerate.

        • @bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Thats great to hear. Not surprised about Starfield tbh, but I am surprised they fixed it for F76, considering it relies largely on the same tech as F4, which does have that limitation.